harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] M3 milestone discussion
Date Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:38:48 GMT
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>> Basing on M2 experience I think 2-mo is a too short for Harmony:
>> 25% of the whole time we would have our workspace somehow frozen.
>> And we couldn't shorten freeze time since we have long running
>> suites and scenarios.
>> IMHO it negatively affects progress of the project.
>> So I'm +1 for having fixed schedule, but 2-mo schedule does not leave
>> enough time for normal development
> I agree with Mikhail - 2 month schedule looks too short.

Why?  How long should we go before checking stability is maintained?  I
see lots of work going on daily, things look good from here.


View raw message