harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nathan Beyer" <nbe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] Code coverage
Date Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:43:26 GMT
A patch for the build scripts would be best, as the coverage could
then be generated at any time by anyone.

-Nathan

On 8/19/07, Rui Hu <roberthurui@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've just generated a coverage report on Harmony trunk5 and branch 6 by EMMA
> recently. Only public API classes are considered. The EMMA I used was
> customized to collect the coverage of core java api.
> The general result is:
> class% --- 68% (1641/2421)
> method% --- 60% (16303/27305)
> block% --- 58% (330724/572138)
>
> The following modules are poor covered , even "zero covered":
> concurrent, CORBA(ORB), XML, RMI, imageio
>
> coverage of awt/swing is not very high, we can improve the whole coverage
> rapidly by improve these two big module.
>
> BTW,  I need a place to publish the report (folder of many HTMLs), any
> advice? Thanks a lot!
>
>
>
> 2007/8/19, Imran Ghory <imranghory@gmail.com>:
> >
> > What the current status with regards to code coverage of the junit tests ?
> > -ve seen the wiki page but it seems a bit out of date (last october). I've
> > tried getting emma to work myself based upon a few of the mailing list
> > posts
> > about it without much luck.
> >
> > Has anyone managed to get an emma instrumented build recently ?
> >
> > Imran
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Robert Hu
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>

Mime
View raw message