Mailing list archives: July 2007

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
ge...@apache.org [admin] Automated Monthly Reminder Sun, 01 Jul, 07:00
clara [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Sun, 01 Jul, 14:17
Xiao-Feng Li   Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Mon, 02 Jul, 01:27
clara     Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Mon, 02 Jul, 01:55
Xiao-Feng Li       Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Mon, 02 Jul, 02:23
Egor Pasko         Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Mon, 02 Jul, 06:37
Mikhail Fursov           Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Mon, 02 Jul, 12:15
clara             Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Tue, 03 Jul, 03:26
Mikhail Fursov               Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Tue, 03 Jul, 09:43
clara                 Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Wed, 04 Jul, 01:48
Mikhail Fursov                   Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Wed, 04 Jul, 11:41
clara                     Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Thu, 05 Jul, 07:51
Mikhail Fursov                       Re: [drlvm][jitrino]Are there any static type checking and type propagation? Thu, 05 Jul, 09:36
Jimmy,Jing Lv [OT] GPL v3 released Sun, 01 Jul, 14:45
Dalibor Topic   Re: [OT] GPL v3 released Mon, 02 Jul, 06:50
robert burrell donkin     Re: [OT] GPL v3 released Mon, 02 Jul, 07:02
Jimmy,Jing Lv     Re: [OT] GPL v3 released Mon, 02 Jul, 07:42
Dalibor Topic       Re: [OT] GPL v3 released Mon, 02 Jul, 10:49
Tim Ellison [buildtest] Time to move branch 2.0 to head? Sun, 01 Jul, 20:38
Nathan Beyer   Re: [buildtest] Time to move branch 2.0 to head? Sun, 01 Jul, 20:58
Stepan Mishura   Re: [buildtest] Time to move branch 2.0 to head? Mon, 02 Jul, 09:39
Tim Ellison     Re: [buildtest] Time to move branch 2.0 to head? Mon, 02 Jul, 09:48
Sean Qiu     Re: [buildtest] Time to move branch 2.0 to head? Wed, 04 Jul, 09:41
Re: [general] Promote snapshot r551077 to M2?
Alexei Zakharov   Re: [general] Promote snapshot r551077 to M2? Mon, 02 Jul, 09:24
Yang Paulex   Re: [general] Promote snapshot r551077 to M2? Tue, 03 Jul, 03:22
Re: Re: [site][doc] improving sitemap
Mikhail Fursov   Re: Re: [site][doc] improving sitemap Mon, 02 Jul, 12:57
Alexey Ivanov     Re: Re: [site][doc] improving sitemap Tue, 03 Jul, 06:05
Spark Shen   Re: [site][doc] improving sitemap Tue, 03 Jul, 06:58
Alexey Ivanov     Re: [site][doc] improving sitemap Thu, 05 Jul, 08:33
Spark Shen       Re: [site][doc] improving sitemap Thu, 05 Jul, 08:46
Morozova, Nadezhda   RE: [site][doc] improving sitemap Tue, 03 Jul, 07:51
Alexey Ivanov   Re: Re: [site][doc] improving sitemap Thu, 05 Jul, 08:14
Morozova, Nadezhda   RE: Re: [site][doc] improving sitemap Sun, 08 Jul, 11:00
Re: [drlvm][init] -XX:vm.dlls is proposed to be -XX:gc.dll
Vladimir Beliaev   Re: [drlvm][init] -XX:vm.dlls is proposed to be -XX:gc.dll Mon, 02 Jul, 14:12
Re: [general][M2] Code unfrozen
Yang Paulex   Re: [general][M2] Code unfrozen Tue, 03 Jul, 03:35
Spark Shen [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 07:13
Spark Shen   Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 07:17
Mikhail Loenko     Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 07:45
Yang Paulex       Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 07:48
Mikhail Loenko         Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 08:43
Spark Shen           Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 09:07
Tim Ellison             Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 09:26
Tim Ellison           Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 09:17
Yang Paulex             Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 09:56
Spark Shen               Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 09:59
Spark Shen       Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 07:50
Jimmy,Jing Lv       Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 08:15
Spark Shen       Re: [classlib] There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented Tue, 03 Jul, 08:19
Re: [classlib][awt] test org.apache.harmony.awt.ListenerListTest failed on Linux x86_64
Vladimir Ivanov   Re: [classlib][awt] test org.apache.harmony.awt.ListenerListTest failed on Linux x86_64 Tue, 03 Jul, 08:19
Alexey Petrenko [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 09:22
Tim Ellison   Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 09:34
Alexey Petrenko     Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 09:39
Tim Ellison       Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 09:43
Mikhail Loenko         Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 09:47
Alexey Petrenko         Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 10:25
Morozova, Nadezhda           RE: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 10:32
Alexey Petrenko             Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 10:40
Tim Ellison             Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 10:54
Alexey Petrenko               Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 11:00
Tim Ellison           Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Tue, 03 Jul, 10:44
Alexei Zakharov           Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Wed, 04 Jul, 15:48
Alexey Petrenko             Re: [site] In Harmony with Eclipse Fri, 06 Jul, 10:39
Spark Shen [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Tue, 03 Jul, 10:57
Tony Wu   Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Tue, 03 Jul, 12:42
Tony Wu     Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Wed, 04 Jul, 04:10
Spark Shen       Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Wed, 04 Jul, 05:55
Spark Shen         Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Wed, 04 Jul, 06:01
Alexei Zakharov     Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Wed, 04 Jul, 15:19
Yang Paulex       Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 02:19
Spark Shen         Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 02:31
Yang Paulex           Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 02:44
Leo Li             Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 02:56
Spark Shen               Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 03:17
Yang Paulex                 Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 03:24
Spark Shen                   Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 03:28
Spark Shen                     Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 03:36
Yang Paulex                       Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 03:44
Spark Shen                         Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 03:49
Leo Li                           Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 05:23
Alexei Zakharov             Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 10:33
Spark Shen               Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 10:37
Tim Ellison                 Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 10:56
Alexei Zakharov           Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 10:15
Alexei Zakharov         Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 10:02
Yang Paulex           Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 10:24
Tim Ellison             Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 10:59
Spark Shen       Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] Thu, 05 Jul, 02:34
Mikhail Loenko [site] our roadmap looks a bit out of date Tue, 03 Jul, 13:27
Mikhail Loenko   Re: [site] our roadmap looks a bit out of date Tue, 03 Jul, 13:48
Mikhail Loenko   Re: [site] our roadmap looks a bit out of date Wed, 04 Jul, 04:27
Yang Paulex   Re: [site] our roadmap looks a bit out of date Thu, 05 Jul, 02:56
Yang Paulex     Re: [site] our roadmap looks a bit out of date Thu, 05 Jul, 08:02
Jimmy,Jing Lv [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap(Was Re: Performance improvement of java.util.HashMap) Wed, 04 Jul, 05:18
Xiao-Feng Li   Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap(Was Re: Performance improvement of java.util.HashMap) Wed, 04 Jul, 06:48
Jimmy,Jing Lv     Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap(Was Re: Performance improvement of java.util.HashMap) Wed, 04 Jul, 08:14
Xiao-Feng Li       Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap(Was Re: Performance improvement of java.util.HashMap) Wed, 04 Jul, 08:33
Jimmy,Jing Lv         Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap(Was Re: Performance improvement of java.util.HashMap) Wed, 04 Jul, 08:59
Xiao-Feng Li           Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap(Was Re: Performance improvement of java.util.HashMap) Wed, 04 Jul, 09:07
Tim Ellison           Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Wed, 04 Jul, 11:23
Tim Ellison     Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Wed, 04 Jul, 11:10
Xiao-Feng Li       Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Wed, 04 Jul, 13:02
Tim Ellison         Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Wed, 04 Jul, 14:20
Tim Ellison   Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Wed, 04 Jul, 11:04
Jimmy,Jing Lv     Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Wed, 04 Jul, 15:05
Tim Ellison       Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Wed, 04 Jul, 19:23
Xiao-Feng Li         Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Thu, 05 Jul, 01:26
Jimmy,Jing Lv         Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Thu, 05 Jul, 03:27
Tim Ellison           Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Thu, 05 Jul, 10:39
Tim Ellison             Re: [classlib] Some further study on hashcode and HashMap Mon, 09 Jul, 12:23
Yuri Dolgov [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Wed, 04 Jul, 09:37
Sean Qiu   Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Wed, 04 Jul, 09:45
Spark Shen   Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Wed, 04 Jul, 09:49
Jimmy,Jing Lv   Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Wed, 04 Jul, 10:15
Yuri Dolgov     Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Wed, 04 Jul, 10:51
Jimmy,Jing Lv       Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Thu, 05 Jul, 03:08
Yuri Dolgov         Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Thu, 05 Jul, 14:21
Yang Paulex   Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Thu, 05 Jul, 02:47
Leo Li   Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Thu, 05 Jul, 03:17
Yuri Dolgov     Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Thu, 05 Jul, 14:30
Leo Li       Re: [site]Rss feed for Harmony news Fri, 06 Jul, 02:28
Mikhail Loenko [drlvm] verifier discussion Thu, 05 Jul, 06:35
Vladimir Beliaev   Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Thu, 05 Jul, 08:38
Xiao-Feng Li     Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Thu, 05 Jul, 09:25
Alexei Fedotov   Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Thu, 05 Jul, 12:18
Xiao-Feng Li     Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Thu, 05 Jul, 12:28
Mikhail Loenko       Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Fri, 06 Jul, 11:46
Vladimir Beliaev         Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Fri, 06 Jul, 13:05
Alexei Fedotov           Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Fri, 06 Jul, 13:19
Mikhail Loenko         Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Fri, 06 Jul, 13:15
Alexey Varlamov           Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Tue, 10 Jul, 07:10
Mikhail Loenko             Re: [drlvm] verifier discussion Tue, 17 Jul, 04:46
Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-4347) [buildtest][vts] 2 VTS tests for jst ibstruction should be removed
Mikhail Loenko   Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-4347) [buildtest][vts] 2 VTS tests for jst ibstruction should be removed Thu, 05 Jul, 07:26
°­¼ºÃµ [general] system requirements Thu, 05 Jul, 10:30
Spark Shen   Re: [general] system requirements Thu, 05 Jul, 10:33
Leo Li     Re: [general] system requirements Thu, 05 Jul, 10:41
Leo Li       Re: [general] system requirements Thu, 05 Jul, 10:47
°­¼ºÃµ       Re: [general] system requirements Thu, 05 Jul, 10:50
Tim Ellison     Re: [general] system requirements Thu, 05 Jul, 10:48
Yang Paulex   Re: [general] system requirements Thu, 05 Jul, 10:51
강성천     [general] iMedia Embedded Linux Thu, 05 Jul, 11:08
Leo Li       Re: [general] iMedia Embedded Linux Thu, 05 Jul, 12:31
Vladimir Ivanov [classlib][logging] how we process 'java.util.logging.config.class' propety Fri, 06 Jul, 09:15
Jimmy,Jing Lv   Re: [classlib][logging] how we process 'java.util.logging.config.class' propety Mon, 09 Jul, 07:56
Leo Li     Re: [classlib][logging] how we process 'java.util.logging.config.class' propety Mon, 09 Jul, 08:41
Vladimir Ivanov       Re: [classlib][logging] how we process 'java.util.logging.config.class' propety Mon, 09 Jul, 09:24
Nina Rinskaya [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Fri, 06 Jul, 10:59
Alexei Fedotov   Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Fri, 06 Jul, 11:12
Nina Rinskaya     Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Fri, 06 Jul, 12:02
Alexei Fedotov       Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Fri, 06 Jul, 13:06
Nina Rinskaya         Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Mon, 09 Jul, 06:22
Alexei Fedotov           Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Mon, 09 Jul, 09:39
Nina Rinskaya             Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Mon, 09 Jul, 14:25
Nina Rinskaya             Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Tue, 10 Jul, 05:17
Alexei Fedotov               Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Tue, 10 Jul, 06:52
Mikhail Loenko                 Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Sun, 15 Jul, 13:22
Mikhail Loenko                   Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Tue, 17 Jul, 04:51
Mikhail Loenko                     Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Tue, 17 Jul, 05:13
Mikhail Loenko                       Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Tue, 17 Jul, 07:11
Egor Pasko                         Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Tue, 17 Jul, 07:25
Mikhail Loenko                           Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Tue, 17 Jul, 07:50
Egor Pasko                             Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Tue, 17 Jul, 09:04
Alexei Fedotov                             Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862 Tue, 17 Jul, 13:18
Mikhail Loenko [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Fri, 06 Jul, 12:01
Mikhail Markov   Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Mon, 09 Jul, 08:44
Alexey Petrenko     Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Mon, 09 Jul, 08:50
Vladimir Ivanov       Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Mon, 09 Jul, 09:10
Alexei Fedotov         Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Mon, 09 Jul, 10:05
Tim Ellison   Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Mon, 09 Jul, 22:13
Alexei Vaskin     [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Tue, 10 Jul, 05:13
Mikhail Loenko     Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Tue, 10 Jul, 10:29
Tim Ellison       Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Wed, 11 Jul, 11:55
Mikhail Loenko         Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Wed, 11 Jul, 15:56
Alexei Vaskin           [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Thu, 12 Jul, 05:00
Tim Ellison             Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Thu, 12 Jul, 20:39
Sergey Kuksenko   Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Tue, 10 Jul, 14:03
Tim Ellison   Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Tue, 24 Jul, 15:16
Mikhail Loenko   Re: [vote] HARMONY-4266 - performance regression testing infrastructure Wed, 25 Jul, 04:27
Morozova, Nadezhda [M2][doc] release notes for milestone updated Sun, 08 Jul, 11:00
Yang Paulex   Re: [M2][doc] release notes for milestone updated Mon, 09 Jul, 02:24
Yang Paulex [classlib][beans]Non-bug difference in java.beans.Statement/Expression(HARMONY-4392) Mon, 09 Jul, 08:24
Spark Shen   Re: [classlib][beans]Non-bug difference in java.beans.Statement/Expression(HARMONY-4392) Mon, 09 Jul, 08:32
Alexei Zakharov     Re: [classlib][beans]Non-bug difference in java.beans.Statement/Expression(HARMONY-4392) Tue, 10 Jul, 14:32
Spark Shen       Re: [classlib][beans]Non-bug difference in java.beans.Statement/Expression(HARMONY-4392) Thu, 12 Jul, 03:25
Re: [vote][p-unit] Are there any objections of using the tool?
Alexey Varlamov   Re: [vote][p-unit] Are there any objections of using the tool? Tue, 10 Jul, 07:43
Alexei Fedotov     Re: [vote][p-unit] Are there any objections of using the tool? Tue, 10 Jul, 08:48
Alexey Petrenko In Harmony M2 with Eclipse 3.3 Tue, 10 Jul, 18:30
Alexei Fedotov   Re: In Harmony M2 with Eclipse 3.3 Tue, 10 Jul, 21:25
Alex Blewitt   Re: In Harmony M2 with Eclipse 3.3 Tue, 10 Jul, 21:55
Alexey Petrenko     Re: In Harmony M2 with Eclipse 3.3 Wed, 11 Jul, 07:49
Egor Pasko   Re: In Harmony M2 with Eclipse 3.3 Wed, 11 Jul, 08:33
Alexei Zakharov     Re: In Harmony M2 with Eclipse 3.3 Thu, 12 Jul, 14:53
Tim Ellison       Re: In Harmony M2 with Eclipse 3.3 Thu, 12 Jul, 16:53
Mikhail Fursov         Re: In Harmony M2 with Eclipse 3.3 Fri, 13 Jul, 07:41
Leo Li           Re: In Harmony M2 with Eclipse 3.3 Fri, 13 Jul, 11:55
éÌØÑ é×ÁÎÏ× [drlvm] Wed, 11 Jul, 10:05
Vladimir Ivanov   Re: [drlvm] Wed, 11 Jul, 10:19
éÌØÑ é×ÁÎÏ×     Re: [drlvm] Wed, 11 Jul, 10:25
Vladimir Ivanov       Re: [drlvm] Wed, 11 Jul, 10:33
éÌØÑ é×ÁÎÏ×         Re: [drlvm] Wed, 11 Jul, 10:40
Mikhail Loenko           Re: [drlvm] Wed, 11 Jul, 10:53
Ilya Ivanov             Re: [drlvm] Wed, 11 Jul, 11:04
Spark Shen [classlib][awt] I could not build on ubuntu, seems the error occured in ParsingTables.cpp Wed, 11 Jul, 10:37
Alexey Petrenko   Re: [classlib][awt] I could not build on ubuntu, seems the error occured in ParsingTables.cpp Wed, 11 Jul, 10:40
Alexey Petrenko     Re: [classlib][awt] I could not build on ubuntu, seems the error occured in ParsingTables.cpp Wed, 11 Jul, 11:00
Zakharov, Vasily M [classlib][awt] Toolkit.getLockingKeyState() is not implemented Wed, 11 Jul, 16:15
Tim Ellison   Re: [classlib][awt] Toolkit.getLockingKeyState() is not implemented Wed, 11 Jul, 16:39
Alexei Zakharov     Re: [classlib][awt] Toolkit.getLockingKeyState() is not implemented Thu, 12 Jul, 09:28
Tim Ellison       Re: [classlib][awt] Toolkit.getLockingKeyState() is not implemented Thu, 12 Jul, 09:43
Zakharov, Vasily M   RE: [classlib][awt] Toolkit.getLockingKeyState() is not implemented Thu, 12 Jul, 10:05
[build] Dependency version update (was: svn commit: r555397 - /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/make/depends.properties)
Tim Ellison   [build] Dependency version update (was: svn commit: r555397 - /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/make/depends.properties) Wed, 11 Jul, 21:02
Spark Shen [classlib][beans] Code seems duplicate for primitive persistence delegate Thu, 12 Jul, 03:12
Alexei Zakharov   Re: [classlib][beans] Code seems duplicate for primitive persistence delegate Thu, 12 Jul, 09:13
Tim Ellison     Re: [classlib][beans] Code seems duplicate for primitive persistence delegate Thu, 12 Jul, 20:47
Spark Shen       Re: [classlib][beans] Code seems duplicate for primitive persistence delegate Fri, 13 Jul, 03:11
Spark Shen     Re: [classlib][beans] Code seems duplicate for primitive persistence delegate Fri, 13 Jul, 03:06
Tim Ellison       Re: [classlib][beans] Code seems duplicate for primitive persistence delegate Fri, 13 Jul, 21:18
Alexei Zakharov         Re: [classlib][beans] Code seems duplicate for primitive persistence delegate Tue, 17 Jul, 13:37
Alexey Petrenko [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Thu, 12 Jul, 09:51
Alexei Fedotov   Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Thu, 12 Jul, 11:46
Alexey Petrenko     Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Thu, 12 Jul, 11:53
Sean Qiu   Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Thu, 12 Jul, 13:56
Spark Shen   Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Fri, 13 Jul, 03:34
Alexey Petrenko     Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Fri, 13 Jul, 06:24
Leo Li       Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Fri, 13 Jul, 12:02
Alexey Petrenko         Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Fri, 13 Jul, 12:08
Leo Li           Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Fri, 13 Jul, 12:22
Sean Qiu         Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Fri, 13 Jul, 17:17
Sean Qiu   Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Fri, 13 Jul, 17:28
Mladen Turk     Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Fri, 13 Jul, 17:37
Leo Li       Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Fri, 13 Jul, 23:49
Sean Qiu         Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Sat, 14 Jul, 06:33
Alexey Petrenko           Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Mon, 16 Jul, 10:21
Alexey Petrenko         Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Mon, 16 Jul, 10:18
Alexey Petrenko       Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Mon, 16 Jul, 10:12
Mladen Turk         Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Mon, 16 Jul, 11:21
Alexey Petrenko           Re: [bundles] Tomcat - Harmony bundle Mon, 16 Jul, 11:41
Alexey Petrenko [classlib] New candidated to close as non-bug-difference... Thu, 12 Jul, 13:17
Alexey Petrenko   Re: [classlib] New candidated to close as non-bug-difference... Tue, 24 Jul, 07:26
Egor Pasko [drlvm][jit][opt] Jitrino.OPT hides inlined stack frames when reporting exceptional track traces Sat, 14 Jul, 09:27
Mikhail Fursov   Re: [drlvm][jit][opt] Jitrino.OPT hides inlined stack frames when reporting exceptional track traces Sun, 15 Jul, 06:41
Tim Ellison     Re: [drlvm][jit][opt] Jitrino.OPT hides inlined stack frames when reporting exceptional track traces Sun, 15 Jul, 08:51
Egor Pasko       Re: [drlvm][jit][opt] Jitrino.OPT hides inlined stack frames when reporting exceptional track traces Sun, 15 Jul, 19:28
Mikhail Fursov         Re: [drlvm][jit][opt] Jitrino.OPT hides inlined stack frames when reporting exceptional track traces Mon, 16 Jul, 11:21
Pamela Yuan [drlvm][jitrino]questiones about HIR to BC Mon, 16 Jul, 07:27
Egor Pasko   Re: [drlvm][jitrino]questiones about HIR to BC Mon, 16 Jul, 09:05
Mikhail Fursov     Re: [drlvm][jitrino]questiones about HIR to BC Mon, 16 Jul, 11:24
Mikhail Fursov [drlvm][jit] Pragma @Inline support in JIT Mon, 16 Jul, 12:53
Re: [classlib][awt] Default fonts needed for headless support (was Re:[contributions][awt] Font library)
Dmitriy Matveev   Re: [classlib][awt] Default fonts needed for headless support (was Re:[contributions][awt] Font library) Mon, 16 Jul, 13:20
Alexey Petrenko     Re: [classlib][awt] Default fonts needed for headless support (was Re:[contributions][awt] Font library) Mon, 16 Jul, 13:33
Alexey Petrenko       Re: [classlib][awt] Default fonts needed for headless support (was Re:[contributions][awt] Font library) Tue, 17 Jul, 07:28
Alexey Petrenko         Re: [classlib][awt] Default fonts needed for headless support (was Re:[contributions][awt] Font library) Tue, 17 Jul, 07:33
Weldon Washburn [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Mon, 16 Jul, 20:02
Mikhail Loenko   Re: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Tue, 17 Jul, 04:31
Weldon Washburn     Re: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Tue, 17 Jul, 05:58
Alexei Zakharov       Re: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Tue, 17 Jul, 16:43
Weldon Washburn         Re: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Tue, 17 Jul, 17:35
Mikhail Fursov           Re: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Wed, 18 Jul, 06:28
Egor Pasko [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Mon, 16 Jul, 22:44
Pavel Ozhdikhin   Re: [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Tue, 17 Jul, 12:57
Egor Pasko     Re: [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Wed, 18 Jul, 10:51
Vladimir Strigun   Re: [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Wed, 18 Jul, 07:42
Egor Pasko     Re: [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Wed, 18 Jul, 09:58
Vladimir Strigun       Re: [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Wed, 18 Jul, 10:04
Egor Pasko         Re: [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Wed, 18 Jul, 10:30
Vladimir Strigun           Re: [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Wed, 18 Jul, 11:41
Egor Pasko             Re: [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Wed, 18 Jul, 15:28
Egor Pasko               Re: [drlvm][jit][opt][abcd] Two-state Inequality Graph for both Lower and Upper problems Wed, 18 Jul, 15:31
Geir Magnusson Jr. Change of Chair of the Apache Harmony PMC Tue, 17 Jul, 06:55
Alex Blewitt   Re: Change of Chair of the Apache Harmony PMC Tue, 17 Jul, 08:39
Tim Ellison     Re: Change of Chair of the Apache Harmony PMC Tue, 17 Jul, 12:25
robert burrell donkin     Re: Change of Chair of the Apache Harmony PMC Tue, 17 Jul, 13:06
Alexei Fedotov   Re: Change of Chair of the Apache Harmony PMC Tue, 17 Jul, 13:50
Alexei Fedotov [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Tue, 17 Jul, 16:51
Mikhail Loenko   Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Wed, 18 Jul, 01:42
Mikhail Fursov     Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Wed, 18 Jul, 06:29
Alexei Zakharov       Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Wed, 18 Jul, 08:52
Alexei Zakharov         Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Wed, 18 Jul, 08:53
Alexei Fedotov           Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Wed, 18 Jul, 08:58
Alexei Zakharov             Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Wed, 18 Jul, 09:12
Alexei Zakharov               Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Wed, 18 Jul, 14:15
Mikhail Loenko                 Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Thu, 19 Jul, 03:37
Mikhail Loenko                   Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Thu, 19 Jul, 03:48
Alexei Zakharov                     Re: [drlvm][cpverifier] Linux build problem Was: [drlvm][general] I think I might have broken the JVM repository Thu, 19 Jul, 07:50
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Oct 200815
Sep 2008178
Aug 2008197
Jul 2008220
Jun 2008180
May 2008278
Apr 2008888
Mar 2008768
Feb 2008519
Jan 2008450
Dec 2007447
Nov 2007648
Oct 2007797
Sep 2007528
Aug 2007350
Jul 2007477
Jun 2007732
May 2007742
Apr 20071197
Mar 2007953
Feb 2007818
Jan 20071179
Dec 20061883
Nov 20062928
Oct 20062905
Sep 20061962
Aug 20061525
Jul 20061628
Jun 20061497
May 20061004
Apr 20061027
Mar 20061190
Feb 20061283
Jan 2006645
Dec 2005233
Nov 2005345
Oct 2005294
Sep 2005166
Aug 200594
Jul 2005207
Jun 2005319
May 20051277