Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94290 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2007 13:58:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2007 13:58:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 69923 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2007 13:57:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 69853 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2007 13:57:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 69818 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2007 13:57:57 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:57:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.242] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:57:55 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b21so35844ana for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:57:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=X1pezZwetVkeKVfrwtxOPo6/fV7Ge+GMAtVWNHzodzp8htC0VJHt38tw7axdVYZ9wZW8dU7qdSMQfKgAqK/7gA52icz/WCELYP1l/ZR5Va3PVfQ8Soy81TOZn/iI3yMNTlHb1yYQz9THPmVh+iPjdfSngUINWRKiYF1PhHOZANg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=JxXY49fz/N3jFMqXg2CspTogGEHSNe9pnP/sKqD9SPg7zdUAvkVLQHrjz3HenSTlbynpcJtYaNiDFtCdNToV43qoud5oV8++hEpTKv1gEXC7hBQj3APksGF0D6vT76dhA+CRzhsVT5R/4TOAl38IL26Ch9YMq5AkWM3/vlpiZDE= Received: by 10.100.190.8 with SMTP id n8mr368258anf.1185371853781; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.12.15 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <94d710af0707250657q29e73da0g123ae60306dab2ca@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:57:33 +0800 From: "Sean Qiu" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: [buildtest2] Shall we Integrate mauve to BTI 2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_189633_21619490.1185371853757" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_189633_21619490.1185371853757 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, guys The Mauve Project[1] is collaborative project whose goal is to create a Fre= e suite of functional, black box, tests for the core Java=99 libraries.Theinitial group of its contributors come from the GNU Classpath, GCJ, and the Kaffe project. All three groups are working on Free (with source) cleanroom implementations of the Java core libraries. So mauve is a clean test projec= t for GNU Classpath to help raise its quality. What's more, its test coverage[2] seems pretty good. The aim of mauve is similar to our unit test, so maybe we can integrate it into our BTI to qualify our harmony's implementation. Obviously, it is based on gpl so there are no restrictions on running the testsuite with our own implementation. But i am not sure we can integrate its source code into our BTI. Its home page doesn't supply a binary one yet. So maybe we can build the source code into somekind binary one and then put it somewhere for running. Is this approach OK? Is there anybody interested in this? Any comments? [1]. http://sourceware.org/mauve [2]. http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/mauve/report/ --=20 Sean Qiu ------=_Part_189633_21619490.1185371853757--