Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95147 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2007 12:43:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2007 12:43:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 34021 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2007 12:43:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 33996 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2007 12:43:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 33987 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2007 12:43:12 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 05:43:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wuyuehao@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.168] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 05:43:09 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so86578uge for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 05:42:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uCGtRJbdy4VMewjqFoYbuX6f6yRRdJ+uLtl9mUkRDBX/GTkAqhDG+J8wgi9CrdU2eCZHManwUA/JzL6EB3aZ0nUPeTR4yT8brnOTY3lhNUYOaxR/eaeUK43y/Roemc6c3jyLfhcqgXJSHvMutBdROuv7qmFlslQq0KwjD8w2tLU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aN45ELLgELkdtIQ4M9yXTSIgNti6z0FpCLxJqqSRaiEe40z1rrcAsd5T3N/7u8lCxgo0DeKkYfypsEhjwyg4lu5j/QSGJ2rxHemu8L1gBiD30kKB9fjxIBzprGMLVkxpGKK8SEZrVUsPQHNVfBnos39FI9YxqHQu1LNpxvlvxWk= Received: by 10.82.108.9 with SMTP id g9mr15329394buc.1183466567478; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 05:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.136.12 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 05:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <211709bc0707030542t668630f2o2b7eb9c375b1b81b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 20:42:47 +0800 From: "Tony Wu" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented] In-Reply-To: <473c46620707030357u38241ac8kc4d544cc4b9573cb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <473c46620707030357u38241ac8kc4d544cc4b9573cb@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 7/3/07, Spark Shen wrote: > I find beans.XMLEncoder does not persist java.lang.reflect.Field properly. > And I suspect there are more classes not properly handled. > Yes, I think so. > I have reported a JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4321 > > If no objection, I will go to implement those missing persistence > functionality. > please go head:) > -- > Spark Shen > China Software Development Lab, IBM > -- Tony Wu China Software Development Lab, IBM