harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yang Paulex" <paulex.y...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [site] our roadmap looks a bit out of date
Date Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:02:12 GMT
2007/7/5, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
>
> Thanks Paulex,
>
> Please review an update here
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4345


Sounds good to me, thanks, Mikhail.

Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> 2007/7/5, Yang Paulex <paulex.yang@gmail.com>:
> > 2007/7/3, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > http://harmony.apache.org/roadmap.html
> > >
> > > I suggest that we remove mentions of TCKs since we can't control the
> > > things there and put more general items to the roadmap, like:
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure we should remove or modify the words on TCK, I think it's
> still
> > our objectives to pass TCK, and the issue is just we cannot plan it due
> to
> > some reason we cannot control, so why not mention it as notation that
> ASF
> > and Harmony keeps trying to secure TCK license from the Java SE JSR spec
> > lead, and once it's done, we'll add it to the roadmap.  I just don't
> want to
> > make people confuse that Harmony doesn't want to pass TCK any longer.
> >
> > start creating stable builds for Java SE 6: Q?'07
> > > start creating stable builds for x86_64: Q?'07
> > >
> > > We probably need to remove items about % of class library coverage:
> > > our current coverage is close to 100%, but to be sure that we are at
> 100%,
> > > we need TCK
> > >
> > > also I suggest to drop "5" from the project goal statement:
> > > "Our project goal is an open source, compatible implementation of Java
> SE
> > > 5"
> > >
> > > Comments? Other suggestions?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mikhail
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paulex Yang
> > China Software Development laboratory
> > IBM
> >
>



-- 
Paulex Yang
China Software Development laboratory
IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message