harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nina Rinskaya" <nina.rinsk...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm][verifier] Please review HARMONY-3862
Date Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:22:25 GMT
Alexei,

Sorry for misleading you. I agree that it's ok to forget about the issue
because there is the Eclipse compiler bug describing this issue. I was just
confused by Harmony and Sun verifiers behavior difference, but it's not a
Harmony issue.

--
Nina

On 7/6/07, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Nina,
>
> > but also Sun's verifier bug
> Mmm, I'm not sure I follow. Isn't it enough to have a bug against
> Eclipse compiler to forget about this issue?
>
> Thank you, Alexei
>
>
> On 7/6/07, Nina Rinskaya <nina.rinskaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Alexei,
> >
> > I'm just not sure how we track compatibility issues if there is a
> difference
> > in Harmony and RI behavior. Is it now proven that it's not only Eclipse
> > Compiler, but also Sun's verifier bug? If yes, I agree that it's not
> > necessary to reopen the issue.
> >
> > --
> > Nina
> >
> > On 7/6/07, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Nina,
> > >
> > > Eclipse bug owner confirmed that this was an issue with the compiler.
> > > Why do you want to reopen the issue against DRLVM?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On 7/6/07, Nina Rinskaya <nina.rinskaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'm writing this just to bring your attention to
> > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3862 and ask
> drlvm/verifier
> > > > people to see whether it's necessary to reopen it.
> > > >
> > > > It says about VerifyError trown by Harmony when running a class
> compiled
> > > by
> > > > Eclipse Compiler. It was closed as 'Cannot Reproduced', but it is
> > > actually
> > > > reproduced (see HARMONY-3862 comments). It looks that it's not
> Harmony
> > > > issue, but Eclipse compiler issue (I opened the bug against Eclipse
> > > > compiler: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=194398), and
> RI
> > > > issue (it should also throw VerifyError, but it doesn't). But still
> we
> > > have
> > > > different behavior on RI and Harmony implementations.
> > > >
> > > > So could someone take care of this issue and probably reopen it as
> > > > compatibility issue if it makes sense? Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Nina
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > With best regards,
> > > Alexei,
> > > ESSD, Intel
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Alexei,
> ESSD, Intel
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message