harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [site] our roadmap looks a bit out of date
Date Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:22:21 GMT
Thanks Paulex,

Please review an update here

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4345

Thanks,
Mikhail

2007/7/5, Yang Paulex <paulex.yang@gmail.com>:
> 2007/7/3, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> >
> > http://harmony.apache.org/roadmap.html
> >
> > I suggest that we remove mentions of TCKs since we can't control the
> > things there and put more general items to the roadmap, like:
>
>
> I'm not sure we should remove or modify the words on TCK, I think it's still
> our objectives to pass TCK, and the issue is just we cannot plan it due to
> some reason we cannot control, so why not mention it as notation that ASF
> and Harmony keeps trying to secure TCK license from the Java SE JSR spec
> lead, and once it's done, we'll add it to the roadmap.  I just don't want to
> make people confuse that Harmony doesn't want to pass TCK any longer.
>
> start creating stable builds for Java SE 6: Q?'07
> > start creating stable builds for x86_64: Q?'07
> >
> > We probably need to remove items about % of class library coverage:
> > our current coverage is close to 100%, but to be sure that we are at 100%,
> > we need TCK
> >
> > also I suggest to drop "5" from the project goal statement:
> > "Our project goal is an open source, compatible implementation of Java SE
> > 5"
> >
> > Comments? Other suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Paulex Yang
> China Software Development laboratory
> IBM
>

Mime
View raw message