harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [site] our roadmap looks a bit out of date
Date Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:48:54 GMT
I think they should be united, btw, Application Status on wiki is also
out of date

2007/7/3, Morozova, Nadezhda <nadezhda.morozova@intel.com>:
>
> A slightly unrelated question:
> How are the roadmap page and the status page
> http://harmony.apache.org/status.html related? do we have to have two?
> It seems the status is really an attempt to set some goals, which is
> what roadmap is also doing.
>
> Cheers,
> Nadya
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:mloenko@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 5:27 PM
> >To: dev@harmony.apache.org
> >Subject: [site] our roadmap looks a bit out of date
> >
> >http://harmony.apache.org/roadmap.html
> >
> >I suggest that we remove mentions of TCKs since we can't control the
> >things there and put more general items to the roadmap, like:
> >
> >start creating stable builds for Java SE 6: Q?'07
> >start creating stable builds for x86_64: Q?'07
> >
> >We probably need to remove items about % of class library coverage:
> >our current coverage is close to 100%, but to be sure that we are at
> 100%,
> >we need TCK
> >
> >also I suggest to drop "5" from the project goal statement:
> >"Our project goal is an open source, compatible implementation of Java
> SE
> >5"
> >
> >Comments? Other suggestions?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Mikhail
>

Mime
View raw message