harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Spark Shen" <smallsmallor...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][beans] Current java6 bean implementation does not persist some class properly [was: There are some JDK 6 feature not implemented]
Date Thu, 05 Jul 2007 02:34:19 GMT
2007/7/4, Alexei Zakharov <alexei.zakharov@gmail.com>:
>
> Spark Chen wrote:
> > > If no objection, I will go to implement those missing persistence
> > > functionality.
>
> FYI we already have number of persistence delegates classes located in
> org.apache.harmony.beans package, and FieldPersistenceDelegate is one
> of them. It contains the algorithm that is very close to one you've
> implemented in the patch for HARMONY-4321. So I don't think we should
> add new FieldPersistenceDelegate, let's fix the existing one instead
> (if it needs fixing). BTW, we also have a special folder
> (src/test/java-internal/org/apache/harmony/beans) where tests for
> persistence delegates are located. Shouldn't we create something like
> FieldPersistenceDelegateTest there?
>
> Thanks,


BTW, I find some beans test cases are excluded. I plan to include and fix
them first.

2007/7/3, Tony Wu <wuyuehao@gmail.com>:
> > On 7/3/07, Spark Shen <smallsmallorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I find beans.XMLEncoder does not persist java.lang.reflect.Fieldproperly.
> > > And I suspect there are more classes not properly handled.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I think so.
> > > I have reported a JIRA:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4321
> > >
> > > If no objection, I will go to implement those missing persistence
> > > functionality.
> > >
> >
> > please go head:)
>
>
>
> --
> Alexei Zakharov,
> Intel ESSD
>



-- 
Spark Shen
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message