Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mloenko@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=P08xVzW6YH+IqAn993xseD49PpIWZrBN6tZibpz9sMpfIwIa2HpO5d5TSvjuE7c8BuGaSompwFvU72yNlgbAVPV2uKYGaGJD7BcSnu+Ca8gZESL4T0HOjCB+UH+uWX4Gp4md3UN+c2Rk216ux0YLiQ7bGrI/tltPeAR5oEaFdGM=
Message-ID: <906dd82e0706250014v599845b5qfa052b861f0a434@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:14:44 +0700
From: "Mikhail Loenko" <mloenko@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [general][M2] Code frozen
In-Reply-To: <9623c9a50706250008p7eed94f3w95072c62cca4f060@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <906dd82e0706240018u3f4f092fqb30fe4aa87b1af03@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0706242359t4a21f1ebu899a5fc5c17dd9f1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <906dd82e0706250004r42911331h64999c8f79518fad@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9623c9a50706250008p7eed94f3w95072c62cca4f060@mail.gmail.com>

2007/6/25, Xiao-Feng Li <xiaofeng.li@gmail.com>:
> On 6/25/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Let's create snapshots and then decide (based on testing results?)
> > what to release
>
> Why not to have them all? I don't understand. Sorry if I missed

It depends on testing results. For example, it does not make much sense
to release IPF build as a stable build (IIRC it currently runs apps
like "hello world"
only)

If we have excellent testing results on the first platform and pretty
modest ones on
the second one (or no testing for the second platform) I'd prefer to
release only the first one.

Thanks,
Mikhail

> anything, but I think it's always good to have the choices available,
> otherwise the users who want to try will build them anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> xiaofeng
>
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail
> >
> > 2007/6/25, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> > > On 6/24/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > We have passed our code freeze date for M2
> > > >
> > >
> > > Mikhail,
> > >
> > > Just to be clear - M1 milestone published snapshots include build for
> > > Windows x86, Linux (libstdc++ v5 and libstdc++ v6) x86 and Windows
> > > x86_64.
> > >
> > > I assume that we still aimed to x86 architecture and I need to build
> > > milestone candidates for:
> > > - Windows x86
> > > - Linux x86. BWT, again for both libstdc++ versions?
> > >
> > > And what about x86_64?
> > >
> > > As I said M1 includes Windows x86_64. Should we publish them to let
> > > the community test them to see how good they are?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stepan.
> > >
> > > > Last time we executed Tim's policy that each commit should have
> > > > approval from two committers, let's follow the same way -- no more
> > > > commits please, without agreement from two committers on the dev list.
> > > >
> > > > Now let's test what we have and see if any critical bugs were
> > > > introduced just before the code freeze. Please raise anything you
> > > > think is critical/blocker for consideration.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Mikhail
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Stepan Mishura
> > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
>