Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of stepan.mishura@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.166.183 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=KASy2g8YFrVgV5OllvpFutJE6DxYTnTj21mR6O99yAjwPqiwGhz4fcaeLHu7d+cfzntjUIZZa8HDuAVn6Yy+edUpr/aojLApbLJats2I4P4RKwKp1s4FYUiauQ9nsBCEVWyXS2vs+hF+JaruyJJ7ClIrGVVQzkO4GVjOccKaWtE=
Message-ID: <6e47b64f0706260411q3474179ctcad8ba22b884b3a4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:11:31 +0700
From: "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [completeness] Japitool changes between Harmony M1 and M2
In-Reply-To: <4680EFBF.7060303@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c3755b3a0706260324n507d8c4fg8b0063f35f26b5b7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0706260329t20cd03c4i110dc9d5f1529f96@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c3755b3a0706260333i915958cu855c3784c16daa69@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0706260344g3cff1618s2decf492a9ec3152@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4680EFBF.7060303@gmail.com>

On 6/26/07, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > On 6/26/07, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2007/6/26, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> >> > On 6/26/07, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > I've run japitool on current Harmony (r550747) and put the results to
> >> > > my apache page.
> >> > Why not on snapshot build r550333? I understand that there should be
> >> > no difference but anyway ...
> >> Because I also think that there is no difference :)
> >
> > But this may be source of confusions. For measuring/announcing any
> > milestone's results I'd recommend to use snapshot build from the site.
>
> We haven't declared the Milestone yet, so there is still room for change.
>

Yes, we haven't.

But the e-mail subject says: changes between Harmony M1 and M2.
Currently we have milestone candidate is r550333 so I'd expect that
results are obtained for milestone candidate. Not for higher revision
which may include other fixes (like you mentioned) - that not quite
correct from my point of view.

Thanks,
Stepan.

> For example, we may choose to fix easy differences that affect the
> public API, like:
>
> method
> java.beans.beancontext.BeanContextSupport.remove(java.lang.Object,
> boolean): public in harmony.mandatory, but protected in jdk15.mandatory
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>