Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of stepan.mishura@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.166.182 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Tg1CDsHLlMOK7rPL1E2jDg/FcNN13X747CA2OK0MRrhKUmP0sw7XdMfPUH2r2ew47RTKacVitFoZeEQrIdt/T5Evd+h4AG5FAutB77g0rxZMOlv82k3NBIWnHv56r7DN2Zl9jsqjWj2ttzBJ0+Agsmga4Wqr24flbjIcvWh24vA=
Message-ID: <6e47b64f0706250312h70259818m821277f04d3a467c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:12:20 +0700
From: "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [general][M2] Code frozen
In-Reply-To: <906dd82e0706250242u53a29864s9f4854561a9e0b9f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <906dd82e0706240018u3f4f092fqb30fe4aa87b1af03@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0706242359t4a21f1ebu899a5fc5c17dd9f1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200706250850.l5P8orOO001265@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
	 <6e47b64f0706250238o6152ca0av84e6a8b810805e6d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <906dd82e0706250242u53a29864s9f4854561a9e0b9f@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/25/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/6/25, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> > On 6/25/07, Mark Hindess wrote:
> > >
> > > On 25 June 2007 at 13:59, "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 6/24/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > We have passed our code freeze date for M2
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mikhail,
> > > >
> > > > Just to be clear - M1 milestone published snapshots include build for
> > > > Windows x86, Linux (libstdc++ v5 and libstdc++ v6) x86 and Windows
> > > > x86_64.
> > >
> > > Do you think it would be possible to produce source snapshots?  The
> > > Apache release FAQ (at http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html ) says:
> > >
> > >  The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All
> > >  releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make
> > >  changes to the software being released. In some cases, binary/bytecode
> > >  packages are also produced as a convenience to users that might
> > >  not have the appropriate tools to build a compiled version of the
> > >  source. In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have
> > >  the same version number as the source release and may only add
> > >  binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of
> > >  the source code release.
> > >
> > > Currently binaries are our primary artifact.  I appreciated that it may
> > > be a little late to try to correct this for this release, but I think it
> > > is important that we try to correct this before we get too comfortable
> > > with the current release process.
> > >
> >
> > I'd suggest to switch to using source snapshots right after M2.
> >
> > > It should now be possible to do:
> > >
> > >  ant bundle_src
> > >  mkdir /tmp/build
> > >  tar -C /tmp/build -xzf target/apache-harmony-src-r550411-snapshot.tar.gz
> > >  cd /tmp/build/harmony-src-550411
> > >  ant -Dauto.fetch=true
> > >
> > > which would seem to me to be more in-keeping with the Apache release
> > > guidelines.
> > >
> > > On this subject, I'd like to permission to commit a patch to correct the
> > > top-level directory name in the source tar.gz/zip files from:
> > >
> > >  harmony-src-550411
> > >
> > > to:
> > >
> > >  apache-harmony-src-r550411
> > >
> >
> > I'm OK with it.
>
> will it require rebuild of the release candidate?
>

I think it is not required.

OK, I've built and uploaded milestone candidates (r550333) for
- Linux x86/x86_64 libstdc++ v5 (and v6 for x86 is in progress)
- Windows x86/x86_64

The snapshots are available from "snapshots v5" page[1] (or can be
taken from dir [2])

[1] http://harmony.apache.org/snapshots_v5.html
[2] http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/snapshots/r550333/

-Stepan.

> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan.
> >
> > > The format of the archive names changed over time and these have become
> > > inconsistent.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >  Mark.
> > >
> > > > I assume that we still aimed to x86 architecture and I need to build
> > > > milestone candidates for:
> > > > - Windows x86
> > > > - Linux x86. BWT, again for both libstdc++ versions?
> > > >
> > > > And what about x86_64?
> > > >
> > > > As I said M1 includes Windows x86_64. Should we publish them to let
> > > > the community test them to see how good they are?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Stepan.