harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Oleg Oleinik" <oleg.olei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] Harmony M2 schedule
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:52:10 GMT
Clarification: DRL VM was used, Windows 2003.

On 6/6/07, Oleg Oleinik <oleg.oleinik@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for capturing the requirements. IMO the requirements still lack
> > > good tests to ensure stability and reliability. I propose to include
> > > the following recently accepted tests:
> > >
> > > 1. VM validation test suite - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3206
> > > 2. Functional test suite - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3528
> > > 3. Stress tests - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3536
> > > 4. Reliability test - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2918
> > >
> > > Olegs seems proposed a reasonable target for the tests-  98% pass rate
> > > of all valid tests from these test suites.
> >
> > what is the % today? where can I find these numbers to make sure 98% is real?
>
> Here are some approximate numbers I have (without details with some
> probability of mistake) to estimate how far we are from 98% pass
> rates:
>
> Reliability test suite: valid 83, pass 59 (0,5 hour per test), fail
> 24, rate: 71%
> Functional: valid 1328, pass 1254, fail 74, rate 94%
> Stress: valid 376, pass 245, fail 131, rate 65%
> VM validation: valid 4346, pass 4263, fail 83, rate 98%
>
> TPTP profiler tests: valid 174, pass 174, rate 100%
> Geronimo unit tests: valid 616, pass 603, fail 13, rate 97,8%
> Eclipse unit tests (wrong test suites patched): valid 36642, pass
> 35598, fail 1044, rate 97%
>
> Harmony class library tests: total ~24000, fail ~300, rate 98,8%
>

Mime
View raw message