harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] ready for release?
Date Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:22:17 GMT
I agree to not include ReleaseNotes if it does not ready yet. But we
need to start preparing release notes a little bit earlier next times.
:)

According to readme.txt for M2... At least we need to remove doc
directory mentioning from it.

SY, Alexey

2007/6/29, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> I think they are not yet ready. And we agreed to have fixed schedule.
> Can we update them in M3? :)
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> 2007/6/29, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>:
> > Just not forget to update readme.txt and ReleaseNotes.html.
> > Everything else is looks ok for me.
> >
> > SY, Alexey
> >
> > 2007/6/29, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> > > So far the following suites and scenarios either passed or had no
> > > unexpected failures or regressions:
> > >
> > > Windows 32:
> > > Classlib (HUT), EUT, Functional, GUT, JDKTools, Reliability, Stress,
> > > TPTP, and VTSVM suites
> > > Ant, Axis, Dacapo, EHWA, Jetty, SciMark, Struts, and Tomcat scenarios
> > >
> > > EGAx48 has been running without problems so far
> > >
> > > Linux 32:
> > > Classlib (HUT), Functional, GUT, JDKTools,
> > > Ant, Axis, Dacapo, EHWA, Jetty, Scimark, Struts
> > >
> > > No other results are vailable so far.
> > >
> > > I suggest that [if we pass EGAx48?] we announce r551077 as M2 on two
> > > platforms: win32 and linux32.
> > >
> > > Comments? Known blockers? TODOs?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mikhail
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message