harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [completeness] Japitool changes between Harmony M1 and M2
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:17:57 GMT
2007/6/26, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> On 6/26/07, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > On 6/26/07, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> 2007/6/26, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> > >> > On 6/26/07, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > I've run japitool on current Harmony (r550747) and put the results
to
> > >> > > my apache page.
> > >> > Why not on snapshot build r550333? I understand that there should
be
> > >> > no difference but anyway ...
> > >> Because I also think that there is no difference :)
> > >
> > > But this may be source of confusions. For measuring/announcing any
> > > milestone's results I'd recommend to use snapshot build from the site.
> >
> > We haven't declared the Milestone yet, so there is still room for change.
> >
>
> Yes, we haven't.
>
> But the e-mail subject says: changes between Harmony M1 and M2.
> Currently we have milestone candidate is r550333 so I'd expect that
> results are obtained for milestone candidate. Not for higher revision
> which may include other fixes (like you mentioned) - that not quite
> correct from my point of view.
So we have not an official M2 snapshot, we have no changes between
550333 and 550747 which can affect Japitool results and we have no
official Japitool result publication.
So what's the problem?

SY, Alexey

Mime
View raw message