harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general][M2] Code frozen
Date Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:05:12 GMT
+1

2007/6/25, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> Let's create snapshots and then decide (based on testing results?)
> what to release
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> 2007/6/25, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> > On 6/24/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > We have passed our code freeze date for M2
> > >
> >
> > Mikhail,
> >
> > Just to be clear - M1 milestone published snapshots include build for
> > Windows x86, Linux (libstdc++ v5 and libstdc++ v6) x86 and Windows
> > x86_64.
> >
> > I assume that we still aimed to x86 architecture and I need to build
> > milestone candidates for:
> > - Windows x86
> > - Linux x86. BWT, again for both libstdc++ versions?
> >
> > And what about x86_64?
> >
> > As I said M1 includes Windows x86_64. Should we publish them to let
> > the community test them to see how good they are?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan.
> >
> > > Last time we executed Tim's policy that each commit should have
> > > approval from two committers, let's follow the same way -- no more
> > > commits please, without agreement from two committers on the dev list.
> > >
> > > Now let's test what we have and see if any critical bugs were
> > > introduced just before the code freeze. Please raise anything you
> > > think is critical/blocker for consideration.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mikhail
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stepan Mishura
> > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >
>

Mime
View raw message