harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general][M2] Code frozen
Date Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:42:26 GMT
2007/6/25, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> On 6/25/07, Mark Hindess wrote:
> >
> > On 25 June 2007 at 13:59, "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 6/24/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We have passed our code freeze date for M2
> > > >
> > >
> > > Mikhail,
> > >
> > > Just to be clear - M1 milestone published snapshots include build for
> > > Windows x86, Linux (libstdc++ v5 and libstdc++ v6) x86 and Windows
> > > x86_64.
> >
> > Do you think it would be possible to produce source snapshots?  The
> > Apache release FAQ (at http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html ) says:
> >
> >  The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All
> >  releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make
> >  changes to the software being released. In some cases, binary/bytecode
> >  packages are also produced as a convenience to users that might
> >  not have the appropriate tools to build a compiled version of the
> >  source. In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have
> >  the same version number as the source release and may only add
> >  binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of
> >  the source code release.
> >
> > Currently binaries are our primary artifact.  I appreciated that it may
> > be a little late to try to correct this for this release, but I think it
> > is important that we try to correct this before we get too comfortable
> > with the current release process.
> >
>
> I'd suggest to switch to using source snapshots right after M2.
>
> > It should now be possible to do:
> >
> >  ant bundle_src
> >  mkdir /tmp/build
> >  tar -C /tmp/build -xzf target/apache-harmony-src-r550411-snapshot.tar.gz
> >  cd /tmp/build/harmony-src-550411
> >  ant -Dauto.fetch=true
> >
> > which would seem to me to be more in-keeping with the Apache release
> > guidelines.
> >
> > On this subject, I'd like to permission to commit a patch to correct the
> > top-level directory name in the source tar.gz/zip files from:
> >
> >  harmony-src-550411
> >
> > to:
> >
> >  apache-harmony-src-r550411
> >
>
> I'm OK with it.

will it require rebuild of the release candidate?

Thanks,
Mikhail

>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
> > The format of the archive names changed over time and these have become
> > inconsistent.
> >
> > Regards,
> >  Mark.
> >
> > > I assume that we still aimed to x86 architecture and I need to build
> > > milestone candidates for:
> > > - Windows x86
> > > - Linux x86. BWT, again for both libstdc++ versions?
> > >
> > > And what about x86_64?
> > >
> > > As I said M1 includes Windows x86_64. Should we publish them to let
> > > the community test them to see how good they are?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stepan.
>

Mime
View raw message