harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "tatyana doubtsova" <tatyanadoubts...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general][M2] Code frozen
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:52:17 GMT
Stepan, thanks.

you results are for regression testing.
I updated http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/milestones/M2 with pass rates on
snapshot r550333.

1 regression is detected so far (on functional test suite,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4278)

EGA x 48 hours, reliability are slill running.
Scenarios axis, Jetty, struts - passed.

Thanks,
Tanya

On 6/26/07, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/25/07, tatyana doubtsova <tatyanadoubtsova@gmail.com > wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've started testing of
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/snapshots/r550333/ on windows
> x86
> > with the following workloads from
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/branches/2.0:
> > EGA x 48 hours, reliability, axis, Jetty, struts, functional, stress,
> eut,
> > gut, tptp, vtsvm.
> > SciMark and Dacapo already passed. I'll report results, as they are
> > available.
> >
>
> Tatyana,
>
> The results for some test are already available at [1]. The include
> Axis, Jetty, Struts testing scenarios, Geromino unit tests, SciMark
> and Dacapo for Linux/Windows x86. You don't need to run them again.
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~smishura/r550333/index.html
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Tanya
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/25/07, Stepan Mishura < stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/25/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 2007/6/25, Stepan Mishura < stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> > > > > On 6/25/07, Mark Hindess wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 25 June 2007 at 13:59, "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mishura@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > On 6/24/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We have passed our code freeze date for M2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mikhail,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just to be clear - M1 milestone published snapshots include
> build
> > > for
> > > > > > > Windows x86, Linux (libstdc++ v5 and libstdc++ v6) x86
and
> Windows
> > > > > > > x86_64.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you think it would be possible to produce source
> snapshots?  The
> > > > > > Apache release FAQ (at http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
)
> > > says:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software.
> All
> > > > > >  releases are in the form of the source materials needed to
make
>
> > > > > >  changes to the software being released. In some cases,
> > > binary/bytecode
> > > > > >  packages are also produced as a convenience to users that might
> > > > > >  not have the appropriate tools to build a compiled version
of
> the
> > > > > >  source. In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must
> have
> > > > > >  the same version number as the source release and may only
add
> > > > > >  binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that
> version
> > > of
> > > > > >  the source code release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently binaries are our primary artifact.  I appreciated
that
> it
> > > may
> > > > > > be a little late to try to correct this for this release, but
I
> > > think it
> > > > > > is important that we try to correct this before we get too
> > > comfortable
> > > > > > with the current release process.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd suggest to switch to using source snapshots right after M2.
> > > > >
> > > > > > It should now be possible to do:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  ant bundle_src
> > > > > >  mkdir /tmp/build
> > > > > >  tar -C /tmp/build -xzf target/apache-
> > > harmony-src-r550411-snapshot.tar.gz
> > > > > >  cd /tmp/build/harmony-src-550411
> > > > > >  ant -Dauto.fetch=true
> > > > > >
> > > > > > which would seem to me to be more in-keeping with the Apache
> release
> > > > > > guidelines.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On this subject, I'd like to permission to commit a patch to
> correct
> > > the
> > > > > > top-level directory name in the source tar.gz/zip files from:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  harmony-src-550411
> > > > > >
> > > > > > to:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  apache-harmony-src-r550411
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm OK with it.
> > > >
> > > > will it require rebuild of the release candidate?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think it is not required.
> > >
> > > OK, I've built and uploaded milestone candidates (r550333) for
> > > - Linux x86/x86_64 libstdc++ v5 (and v6 for x86 is in progress)
> > > - Windows x86/x86_64
> > >
> > > The snapshots are available from "snapshots v5" page[1] (or can be
> > > taken from dir [2])
> > >
> > > [1] http://harmony.apache.org/snapshots_v5.html
> > > [2] http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/snapshots/r550333/
> > >
> > > -Stepan.
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Mikhail
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Stepan.
> > > > >
> > > > > > The format of the archive names changed over time and these
have
> > > become
> > > > > > inconsistent.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >  Mark.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I assume that we still aimed to x86 architecture and I
need to
> > > build
> > > > > > > milestone candidates for:
> > > > > > > - Windows x86
> > > > > > > - Linux x86. BWT, again for both libstdc++ versions?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And what about x86_64?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As I said M1 includes Windows x86_64. Should we publish
them
> to
> > > let
> > > > > > > the community test them to see how good they are?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Stepan.
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message