harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Weldon Washburn" <weldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [testing] Trap in EUTs (was: Re: [general][M2] Code frozen)
Date Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:52:52 GMT
On 6/27/07, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > On 6/27/07, Nina Rinskaya wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> It looks that r549864 commit has introduced a regression:
> >>
> >
> > I think it's too risky to rollback the commit. It looks like
> > (according to the evaluation) that the impact of the regression is
> > low. So I wouldn't fix it in M2. I think we should mention the issue
> > in milestone's release notes and fix it after M2. Objections?
>
> Do we know how to fix it?  Weldon?  It may be worth considering the
> impact of the fix.


I have just now started looking at this bug.  I hope to have an update
sometime today.
  - Weldon



Regards,
> Tim
>
>
> >
> org.eclipse.team.tests.ccvs.core.subscriber.testConcurrentAccessToSyncSettestcase
> >
> >> from Eclipse Unit Tests ('teamcvs' suite) intermittently crashes on
> >> Windows 2003 (x86) with the following output:
> >>
> >>   [java] Windows reported exception: 0xc0000005
> >>     [java] Registers:
> >>     [java]     EAX: 0x00410048, EBX: 0x140e9870, ECX: 0x000022a2, EDX:
> >> 0x00383f30
> >>     [java]     ESI: 0x16e3ed0c, EDI: 0x0b3943f0, ESP: 0x10d6fa78, EBP:
> >> 0x13f461f4
> >>     [java]     EIP: 0x1000430c
> >>     [java] Stack trace:
> >>     [java]   0: hythread_thin_monitor_exit (??:-1)
> >>     [java] <end of stack trace>
> >>
> >> The testcase deals with synchronized resources, and probably the crash
> >> happens whyle adding ~1000-5000th element to the synchronized
> collection.
> >>
> >> The issue impacts only 1 testcase, but the whole suite (170 tests) is
> >> reported as crashed, it reduces EUT pass rate by 0,4%.
> >>
> >> The issue was not found earlier because it is an intermittent issue
> >> (but it
> >> is often reproducible, ~3 times per 5 runs).
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Nina
> >>
> >> On 6/24/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > We have passed our code freeze date for M2
> >> >
> >> > Last time we executed Tim's policy that each commit should have
> >> > approval from two committers, let's follow the same way -- no more
> >> > commits please, without agreement from two committers on the dev
> list.
> >> >
> >> > Now let's test what we have and see if any critical bugs were
> >> > introduced just before the code freeze. Please raise anything you
> >> > think is critical/blocker for consideration.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Mikhail
> >
>



-- 
Weldon Washburn

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message