harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general][M2] Code frozen
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:43:55 GMT
(you may want to report this new topic in a new thread)

Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> I run the failed Math tests and got a litle bit strange results:
> these 3 tests passed on the runtime built by DRLVM build and failed on
> the runtime built by federated build. ie the command:
> ant test -Dbuild.module=luni
> -Dtest.jre.home=projects/trunk/working_vm/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/
> 
> -Dtest.case=org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest
> 
> leads to the message:
>    [junit] Tests run: 44, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.335 sec
>    [junit] Test org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest
> FAILED
> 
> while command:
> ant test -Dbuild.module=luni
> -Dtest.jre.home=projects/drlvm/trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/
> 
> -Dtest.case=org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest
> 
> leads to the message:
>    [junit] Running org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest
>    [junit] Tests run: 44, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.332 sec
> 
> Both runtimes report one version:
> svn = r550333, (Jun 26 2007), Linux/ia32/gcc 3.3.3, release build
> 
> Could someone from DRLVM-build gurus look at this issue?
> 
> thanks, Vladimir
> 
> On 6/26/07, Ivan Popov <ivan.g.popov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As I mentioned above, it is known failure, not a regression. It's safe
>> to add it to exclude list and ignore for now.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Ivan (jdwp person)
>>
>> On 6/26/07, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Stepan Mishura wrote:
>> > > On 6/26/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
>> > >> On 6/25/07, Ivan Popov wrote:
>> > >> > I see two failures of jdktools tests, which are not new ones.
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >> Ivan,
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks for prompt failure analysis. I'm going to add
>> HoldEventsTest to
>> > >> exclude list for intermittent failures on Linux, increase timeout
>> and
>> > >> re-run tests.
>> > >
>> > > Ops, sorry ... I've updated the exclude list without getting
>> agreement
>> > > from another committer. Please let me know if there any objections
>> for
>> > > updating the exclude list.
>> >
>> > It would be good to hear from a VM/jdwp person whether this is a
>> > regression that needs to be fixed, or whether it is safe to ignore it
>> > for now.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Tim
>> >
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message