Ok, If no one objects, I'd like to provider a new patch for 2436 and
create another JIRA to record this non-bug difference, since the old
one is outdated.
On 6/11/07, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tony Wu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Seems RI cached some bytes, which can be read even if the jarfile has
> > been closed. I wonder what's your opinion about that? should we follow
> > RI to cache the bytes and should we use the buffer size the same as
> > RI?
>
> Sounds like a bug in the RI to me. If the JAR is closed I would not
> expect to be able to read from it. I suggest closing as a non-bug
> difference.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
--
Tony Wu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
|