Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-27289-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5600 invoked from network); 26 May 2007 03:31:20 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 May 2007 03:31:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 91593 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2007 03:31:23 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91565 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2007 03:31:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@harmony.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@harmony.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@harmony.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.harmony.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91556 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2007 03:31:23 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 20:31:23 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of liyilei1979@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.134.186 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.134.186] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.186)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 20:31:17 -0700
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w1so919103mue
        for <dev@harmony.apache.org>; Fri, 25 May 2007 20:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=AvPrHb7ZDvZ5VSCj4ETcC2JUv3rsYFazwnA+viYi+Tg+TU5f7tboH5Ek3nRgsZtiXc9EZyER+MRSnIA+hnNTKTVqL6VrU/FWXZNng7MI0RU6mOdj2aP7l5q/W9hktuLgDiufaK65NY8c6YI2i+LG5oonoK5PLbJ2pIDrcEKFP5Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=doFopYxz+ebEm+FMpA608dP0zZatr8yiQrI9TiuW00JErIg+Pu0n8+fIxcqKZZhcnCVXF4WCkwf81L/L2eB3E9UKxqKGyuEIfE9MsmueBTQ62U0Kt7lQPwHCy4xTKER1/aZl2j+DWZ16IbyjRs5uyyri/djQTCIrKNmmu9Rp41o=
Received: by 10.82.176.3 with SMTP id y3mr6705100bue.1180150256112;
        Fri, 25 May 2007 20:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.82.159.7 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 20:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e66844de0705252030m58b434e3v9f322506013e0b8e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:30:56 +0800
From: "Leo Li" <liyilei1979@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [IBMVME] IBMVME can't run
 j.u.c.Executors.newFixedThreadPool(int).
In-Reply-To: <3b3f27c60705251944i7d365f64gd9817fd22a528900@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_117123_25111856.1180150256076"
References: <4d0b24970705250620q5bb99809u72d95a1e55c15064@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3b3f27c60705251944i7d365f64gd9817fd22a528900@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

------=_Part_117123_25111856.1180150256076
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

  Waiting for the next release...

On 5/26/07, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Known issue. Anything that depends on sun.misc.Unsafe from
> java.util.concurrent will not work on IBM VME.
>
> On 5/25/07, Andrew Zhang <zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I  tried to run following code with IBMVME,
> >
> > Executors.newFixedThreadPool(_threadCount);
> >
> > but I got:
> >
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.apache.harmony.kernel.vm.Objects
> >     at sun.misc.Unsafe.<init>(Unsafe.java:64)
> >     at sun.misc.Unsafe.<clinit>(Unsafe.java:34)
> >     at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method)
> >     at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:177)
> >     at java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger.<clinit>(
> AtomicInteger.java
> > :28)
> >     at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method)
> >     at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:177)
> >     at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.<init>(
> > LinkedBlockingQueue.java:75)
> >     at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.<init>(
> > LinkedBlockingQueue.java:164)
> >     at java.util.concurrent.Executors.newFixedThreadPool(Executors.java
> :55)
> > ...
> >
> > Is it a known issue with IBMVME? or did I miss something? Thanks!
> >
> > ps: it works with DRLVM.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew Zhang
> >
> > http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/
> >
>



-- 
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM

------=_Part_117123_25111856.1180150256076--