Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77157 invoked from network); 29 May 2007 05:50:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 May 2007 05:50:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 72491 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2007 05:50:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 72465 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2007 05:50:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 72456 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2007 05:50:08 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 22:50:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of xiaofeng.li@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.228] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 22:50:03 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h26so1485086wxd for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 22:49:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KKLq1INrBi90QGn3YZRlyYwh567WrIGHjmeh4ldTBa+BxLA4LDWACAht4CQ4e7K9iucGooSY8+mfLDO+HoJCF8dsUxpuhzgWzvUZ3o1os40VORS0OkTEOK2BFgIFdzso+5Ik2VlJwYQ7M2/Z9R9eWabC8gLfmVTpkrPu70Xh9hc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eY6pJSp9TXugrb566QcvXKFCatj/pUk+n/Vc9ovVMFvabVlMA1qOlMW2TC5/qYvJn79Dy3oVkneEe2ok4hZhoXMcu7RZmpYjDY55EaKyz1WitYZRSutlEyzXSTtsuk/3aAfyPMMlaCUCdSDDM/2yj+n+q8i1h3lJ/iBhK6zLSro= Received: by 10.90.34.3 with SMTP id h3mr4287225agh.1180417782482; Mon, 28 May 2007 22:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.113.3 with HTTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 22:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9623c9a50705282249h44752415r469a315640809f02@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:49:42 +0800 From: "Xiao-Feng Li" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm][threading] should we remove gc_status field of "class VM_thread {...}" in vm_threads.h ? In-Reply-To: <4dd1f3f00705282232s6af01e9ep331a9041253190d3@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4dd1f3f00705282232s6af01e9ep331a9041253190d3@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org GCv5 doesn't use it at the moment, and I don't think GCv5 will use it soon. Thanks, xiaofeng On 5/29/07, Weldon Washburn wrote: > The uses of this field are currently commented out. Perhaps someone from > GCV5 area can tell us if we need to keep this field around. In other words, > will it be uncommented soon? > > -- > Weldon Washburn > -- http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com