Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27324 invoked from network); 29 May 2007 08:21:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 May 2007 08:21:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 57626 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2007 08:21:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 57599 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2007 08:21:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 57590 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2007 08:21:29 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2007 01:21:29 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ivavladimir@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.238 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.238] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2007 01:21:24 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h26so1521039wxd for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 01:21:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=EsOcvJt9svcm3oHUcsqBWcngMxFucRJ9Csez/DGspoYmzy9fYRgCo34teYjpcFj06nav5nkDMsNXfdXHfMT+GmLqXriZJameKCU8XmuWRkLqPFfmTJ+viubaURUmsEjV3lQGkrJ4egxKBrgtyGL/PLXs0HnKQ80O+9sLpGrgsi0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=FfKTNGJRt8WMlA2hpvEUs+RwRyJANelZlTGKdNpKko3nilKQLWquzNxcSN4FxC3tz6+x4G/WbN8h1WX25t4/MPnghhKAa7c9a1tlQ6Kd6fHeQRaxSbN64VWg8rKNfba3GFGtkMDev3hfA1ERyJWh55NyMT803F0dezZi50aQuj0= Received: by 10.70.19.20 with SMTP id 20mr9808925wxs.1180426863730; Tue, 29 May 2007 01:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.47.17 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2007 01:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7273946b0705290121s7ab626det47ff7de60aaec72b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:21:03 +0700 From: "Vladimir Ivanov" To: dev Subject: [drlvm][general]do we need this record in run log? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, some days ago the record: "The GC did not provide gc_add_weak_root_set_entry()" appeared in the test execution log. Is it necessary? I suggest commented this out to not mislead users by VM internal information. thanks, Vladimir