Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13319 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 18:44:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2007 18:44:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 70760 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 18:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 70728 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 18:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 70718 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2007 18:44:30 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:44:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of weldonwjw@gmail.com designates 66.249.90.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.90.181] (HELO ik-out-1112.google.com) (66.249.90.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:44:22 -0700 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b32so211294ika for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:44:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=DWJHvl1/VjKycaN6GHlEqs/3guI1Wz3zj1gwCkD7CURDGJ3zAbhHDSMaXozwx+5ctU6Tm3UieMeSKihikdWTRylKxQlWUln2uBUWe757bc439k3DkcO/AYI5bntUA+RIw3vOsdkVwwntFfOnb0OAmp0+fhssz3F8Eu2iTNznwN8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=q/b9O3cuOlWqvfb+q0XEkXEr+8wMxWjUduYlxqUsriJLlvqp8NoAUnhPrcDsfGnx2I6NX4HrDlHm7YMAKYBaaJnxchh/73n/4z+ukkZc0K/QdocBQieI2YTT3RKJrZguFS8rX9MHmUZWo9l6AVm+/fHf15aXngwwHRx3UFOE6Hk= Received: by 10.78.147.3 with SMTP id u3mr409727hud.1178131441533; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.137.4 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 11:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4dd1f3f00705021144r3a27e20bo2acd1a716ea5bd9a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:44:01 -0700 From: "Weldon Washburn" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: [drlvm][gc] when will switch to GCV5 happen? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13844_7002570.1178131441459" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_13844_7002570.1178131441459 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline All, It seems the GCV5 team keeps re-integrating with the latest svn HEAD and never completely fixes all the regression failures. Now that we have taken the snapshot for javaone, does it make sense to simply switch to GCV5 and fix the bugs that result? The reason I ask is because I am working on threading memory leaks that assume GCV5. It would be good to get the (minor) redesign and development of the memory leak problems committed quickly. -- Weldon Washburn ------=_Part_13844_7002570.1178131441459--