From dev-return-27277-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Fri May 25 11:21:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5188 invoked from network); 25 May 2007 11:20:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 May 2007 11:20:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 53086 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2007 11:21:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 53050 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2007 11:21:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 53041 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2007 11:21:02 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 04:21:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of aleksey.ignatenko@gmail.com designates 66.249.90.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.90.183] (HELO ik-out-1112.google.com) (66.249.90.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 04:20:54 -0700 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c30so549912ika for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 04:20:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=OrQa4k1QhLXADQ85nL0NC3aeTaMtOMf9mOe7JtaD+FoKqvr8085WfNdTleK9o1HHnUI+KASFGP1/RT6L/cBE4ESdv1G8UQ94z/VA1s2kEFC8LxlCLOCivumkqiLmnOdM7qif4UNbrQcRZCHBgXZacJo4xRPemaN30ttecqhQtsI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Hw/x4/u3O/7wsrWYj8WNNZWdMqKJFP/22TRvHXd+CnzyjO5jBbuBMj6zfGNbPpqb27y33v/lTbc1IdRhXn9ABCKAsJqcznby3st5xwQoLTaHHAXfUvRQZUvjsFdB2zuV9Q/2Pgo3THtrKhJru2LCfdwyRQbS37/yWvqxYW6lErs= Received: by 10.78.107.8 with SMTP id f8mr847191huc.1180092033568; Fri, 25 May 2007 04:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.145.11 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 04:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5836de490705250420h799bc0abi23197ca98f9f902e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 18:20:33 +0700 From: "Aleksey Ignatenko" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: [drlvm][kernel]j.l.Compiler functionality is not implemeted - bug in Harmony? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_77126_24123922.1180092033539" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_77126_24123922.1180092033539 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, I want to ask about future of j.l.Compiler class in Harmony. I see in drlvm kernel classes that most j.l.Compiler functions are implemented with minimum spec requirements and do not provide any JIT related functionality. My question is if drlvm needs to support alternative JIT compiler using j.l.Compiler functionality in future. The only way to effect JIT I know is options like -Xem:opt, -Xem:jet and so on. Also I found that property java.compiler is set to "client" value by default in Harmony (but not set in RI). Spec says that it is assumed to be the name of a JIT library which is to be loaded by JVM with loadLibrary method. After it was loaded java_lang_Compiler_start() is called to start JIT. Can we consider this to be a bug in Harmony and file JIRA? Thanks, Aleksey Ignatenko. ------=_Part_77126_24123922.1180092033539--