harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][tools] Removing tools module
Date Thu, 03 May 2007 09:23:44 GMT
jdktools looks more suitable for launcher.

from the other hand we need a way to build and run classlib,
preferably without having to build jdktools...

Thanks,
Mikhail

2007/5/3, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > On 5/3/07, Tim Ellison wrote:
> >> Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> >> > OK. Now CC/CI systems checkout CLASSLIB and DRLVM as separated
> >> workspaces.
> >>
> >> And you will need "jdktools" to get a launcher.  If people prefer that
> >> the launcher is built from classlib again then that is fine, I can put
> >> it back.  My understanding was that it was moved to jdktools for a
> >> reason and removing the duplication meant removing the copy from
> >> classlib.  I can remove the duplication in the other direction if people
> >> prefer.
> >>
> >
> > I'd prefer to have the launcher in classlib. I can not recall strong
> > reason to have it in jdktools. As I understand not we have to build
> > jdktools just to run classlib tests with IBM VME (or any other VM).
> > And it looks quite confusing for me.
>
> It was never my intention to cause trouble, so I'm happy to restore the
> launcher to classlib LUNI either permanently or at least until we have
> had a full discussion.  I will, however, also remove it from jdktools
> now so that we only have one copy.
>
> [ In my defence, I did announce I was doing this at the top of this
> thread [1], and gave everyone about four hours to respond :-) ]
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200705.mbox/%3c46386C53.90106@gmail.com%3e
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>

Mime
View raw message