Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43041 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2007 14:57:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2007 14:57:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 51018 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2007 14:57:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 50462 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2007 14:57:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 50453 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2007 14:57:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:57:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of paulex.yang@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.230] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:57:33 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id j2so1549225nzf for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:57:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=k8Pi1wWxzfZSyzxq9vSu1hYeTeWmm/e8xZpFC67H52+JUzSsEdgPaAsc1tJSAL+cYA4kyqIKwL+o9yKPjXHORWsX/h5F1XfNqIxZkU39gcaB2gRIDcsguquYUMXJsXWS5BgZP2z4oFs5uqbsIjmrNvQME3dyQQq3ePBQGqutYBk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=pJpaanmI9yjL6nOfRWwiEW4X3fOKJPxKs0r5onKG/S4DUe7S0TWa/+AZHRMd6BDYtMMsO2oAqTH0clz3GGh7bvwofmM2V1S+cjjTzBd7XXx4ItY2GJs1uEZwQWjttYJt6fv/Roi7BR7Do1cj3/gB1PWkOExpt6hgyyOmo9ybSNM= Received: by 10.115.93.16 with SMTP id v16mr1377873wal.1177772232791; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.121.13 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:57:12 +0800 From: "Yang Paulex" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [snapshot] Missing debug info in class files In-Reply-To: <46334DD9.9050101@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_88074_25720685.1177772232735" References: <46334DD9.9050101@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_88074_25720685.1177772232735 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I have no strong feelingson JRE, but +1 to keep debug info for HDK/JDK build. The debug info is very helpful 2007/4/28, Tim Ellison : > > When we build in release mode, the properties.xml file sets up javac to > strip the debug info from .class files (line numbers, vars, etc). While > this may be argued for a JRE, it is clearly not useful for the JDK or > HDK builds. We only save some JAR file space, so I suggest we disable > this 'feature' and always include debug info in class files. > > Anyone agree/disagree? > > Tim > -- Paulex Yang China Software Development laboratory IBM ------=_Part_88074_25720685.1177772232735--