Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39990 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 10:01:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 10:01:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 32005 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2007 10:01:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 31980 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2007 10:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 31971 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2007 10:01:31 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:01:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.238 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.238] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:01:23 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id j2so691106nzf for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:01:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i9XTgbJIHIz1BkxPSTKCYqGv1S+7bbTNL0uVTD8dBxNV52SDR9hGjN7PMePM2n+4oZULrzs+kHADz6RiE/ozjanGn//uyBXGKXVJFRzNOB8mTx73d8mpu0jGZaFqB73RbpMYmmnkA3daL+VQedkRLwl9OMiq1U8eAPtopDT4TVg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jop6rW8yvADNtoLmo7/DEBoIKmPNj1hk4ynUHGtPyxC3y7iepwtPiyD2S2aXdyXcoQi61c0l6i6vFvLgbchI1WqoD2SevA2SgoALTEWp/bCo6ixy7j9Ewtvu6fuywlPZNKfMPVdd07wHEGXDfLQ7rHIQ6ShHWaoqRzw3YfmYkDk= Received: by 10.114.211.1 with SMTP id j1mr537852wag.1177581661868; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.123.16 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:01:01 +0400 From: "Alexey Petrenko" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [snapshot] Freezing the code for Milestone build? In-Reply-To: <906dd82e0704260246j30d33616t3ffc04c9797cd09a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46306E6A.60204@gmail.com> <906dd82e0704260240m5eaef815g29b7113a6bf24892@mail.gmail.com> <906dd82e0704260246j30d33616t3ffc04c9797cd09a@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Now means now. I see number success alerts from CC and all the x86 CCs looks up on the mentioned page. Did I miss something? SY, Alexey 2007/4/26, Mikhail Loenko : > 2007/4/26, Alexey Petrenko : > > Looks like all the CCs are up now. Is that correct? > > the 'now' is last time you pressed 'refresh' :) > what does 'now' mean in your case? > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > > > > SY, Alexey > > > > 2007/4/26, Mikhail Loenko : > > > We should freeze when all CCs are in the up state [1] > > > > > > Can we use the snapshots [2]? My understanding is that the snapshots > > > are updated in the "all CCs up" moments, so probably almost-a-week old > > > snapshots are the best for the Milestone. > > > > > > Were there any significant changes since that? I know about gc switch, > > > but not sure how it affected stability... > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mikhail > > > > > > [1] http://www.harmonytest.org/upload/cc1.html > > > [2] http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/snapshots/ > > > > > > 2007/4/26, Tim Ellison : > > > > To ensure we get a stable build we need to freeze the code for a short > > > > duration, which will allow us to: > > > > > > > > - produce the set of milestone candidates, > > > > i.e. a full rebuild on Windows, Linux (with libstdc++ v5 dependency) > > > > and Linux (with libstdc++ v6 dependency) in JRE, JDK, and HDK > > > > formats. At this point we will still only publish x86 snapshots. > > > > > > > > - test the snapshots, > > > > i.e. test installs (it would be good if you have a machine without > > > > your usual development environment set up to ensure we don't have > > > > dependencies on dev tools); and testing various applications to check > > > > they work as well as we would expect for this snapshot. > > > > > > > > While we do this it is helpful if the codebase is not being changed. It > > > > sounds like people are happy enough to freeze HEAD rather than create a > > > > branch, so let's do that. > > > > > > > > During the freeze there should be no commits unless we agree here on the > > > > dev list that there is a problem serious enough for us to re-spin a new > > > > candidate. I would hope that producing the snapshots and some focused > > > > testing can happen over one or two days (max) to declare the build good. > > > > Once the milestone is declared good we will reopen for development as > > > > usual. > > > > > > > > Does that sound like a reasonable procedure? Did I miss anything out? > > > > > > > > so: > > > > - when do we freeze (today/tomorrow)? any outstanding MUST fix's? > > > > - volunteers with machines for producing the candidates? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > >