Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69544 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2007 06:31:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2007 06:31:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 9816 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2007 06:31:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 9793 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2007 06:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 9784 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2007 06:31:10 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:31:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.246 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.246] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.246) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:31:03 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so73680ana for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:30:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iFRh2LKkgBULDk8tOpryG7dmuPcZYq4iX60oxQkdhV+46BVBdanaZHL02VxBZyy4KSSgf3Hgn/UmocHQmf5k6mOMU6N0WSWDOryvDHzL5yjEM1It/M/0MYk4GjLGAjraHYwVPBUKRX0VVxw+kDAyBdo1LZspq2ah/JtwWS5/Pyg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YyQxWr2KLxMc45vonnxQ+9rtPijgwp1GxENJiwg421ar85E2fFhr5p5UcV6WYr+FHlSu3ADMCsZ3B6qYM3QdIpN1As/3/jF7AOFUOEOKIEjJpxWud7ZxvDAl4LCdDav62wIAaPLlcBw/m9Z6106x+z1tN2iaQ3zRHTKwRU7s8IQ= Received: by 10.114.151.13 with SMTP id y13mr76944wad.1176877841256; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.123.16 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:30:41 +0400 From: "Alexey Petrenko" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib]complete java 6 api(Agreement and call for volunteers) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <211709bc0704172245w76779d23t4af4ae6b3d0b5752@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org oops, here is a link to japitool comparison: http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk6-harmony.html :) 2007/4/18, Alexey Petrenko : > 2007/4/18, Tony Wu : > > Thanks Stepan and all the people who helped to boost, now we have a > > branch for java 6 classlib. > > > > Before we start to complete the new feature, I think we should have an > > agreement addition to Good issue resolution guideline[1]. > > > > I just draft 2 points here in order to use the little to get the big. > > > > 1. The suggested pattern of JIRA Summary is > > [java6][classlib][$module]blabla.. so that it is easy for committers > > to know where the patch should be applied. > It looks like we do not have "[component][module]" requirement in > Harmony guidelines at all. But it would be nice to have :) > > > 2. Make your patch as small as possible so that it won't take much > > time to understand. > This can be applied to ALL the patches and it also would be nice if > ALL the patches will have patch descriptions :) > > > I'll start with io and nio_char module. I have created a page on > > harmony wiki [2] to record the work. any volunteer on other modules? > We still got ~3% of unimplemented API in AWT/Swing area for Java5. Not > very important API but... :) > So we will need to synchronize our AWT/Swing development with Java6 branch. > > BTW here is japitool comparison between Java6 and Harmony [1]. We have > 89.25% success rate. The main development areas (new packages) are > org.xml, javax.ws, javax.util, javax.script, javax.lang, > javax.activation, javax.annotation. > > So there are a lot of places to work on :) > > SY, Alexey >