Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39878 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2007 04:11:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2007 04:11:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 97418 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2007 04:11:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 97380 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2007 04:11:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 97370 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2007 04:11:11 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:11:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mike.fursov@gmail.com designates 72.14.204.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.204.228] (HELO qb-out-0506.google.com) (72.14.204.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:11:04 -0700 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id d7so58913qbd for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:10:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=G5Qgi2SH6TqUntolApgBpGyACMjM38LaookMRQ1FrJ3cMomwMWRm2jLAr+q2s/0gzpZduT4jY1+71HlSoHtDLf8kfrhjl7YvW3xvzK1A7Jg7R2VuKqFUd4z5aCFM+JheE9X+IhCV8xcMPuzN2J12sWnGpNjjWJBBr8LX5HKTUD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=G81go8hZQ47yenlsucRoK1S66FsZtM3DASmbB9+l9y7OZPdwZF6By3XuLnZ8ggktsKSYtZW9T6uu85k2H24Sx//aASxTxxkhdEL1AmC+KncOcNEGgpGpLq6rH9Wsg42g21KHNMAQQZ0cmeGE7xDA+lwru6NgTkRHt2bGePVDlK0= Received: by 10.114.159.1 with SMTP id h1mr588948wae.1176351043175; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.95.12 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:10:43 +0700 From: "Mikhail Fursov" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_22325_29570915.1176351043111" References: <6e47b64f0704112021t1bbb551eod494edcad060d54b@mail.gmail.com> <6e47b64f0704112022x400a87e8w2c3801302c060827@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_22325_29570915.1176351043111 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1 - lets do the branch for classlib module On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote: > > Stepan, > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced, > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot. > +1 for that. > > 2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura : > > +1 > > > > -Stepan. > > > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads: > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off! > > > > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting. > > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6 > > > [ ] 0 No opinion > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason > > > > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Stepan Mishura > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division > > > > > > -- Mikhail Fursov ------=_Part_22325_29570915.1176351043111--