Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71481 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 12:03:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 12:03:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 42201 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2007 12:03:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 42172 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2007 12:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 42163 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2007 12:03:30 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:03:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of stuart.a.ballard@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.251 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.251] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.251) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:03:23 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so204867ana for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:03:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tSPxV3SEbkUhytArJ3ExJSGTGPBJntnGRmkxSrX8pR62N44HosxUrKclH0eQDBH0i/EZPd+OyzJ5W19YpS5WIS2CThEH45juYlym+56Y0pDN2UvwSgatEYxaG6+9DNBHSa7miRXwG7vPkbnEXDow/DkJKNwucUZ9EXCjNHpBD5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KMEdoWmq7DIhXrDjxN2G+Bmx9lt5oZNrDR7IWaAoMp0WsFhFKKz8dpn8ArgBhEXELjcDFeC1YoPxkDFhPGQ49+1f1M9HgRqwb5PxlRFSUq9WsScfI76Vj+Vgcpp3b5O/VOlpRWcFrE/5YuKfiLmOSlBIdfce/WJeAudacPGsds4= Received: by 10.100.5.17 with SMTP id 17mr1012602ane.1177588982446; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.133.4 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:03:02 -0400 From: "Stuart Ballard" To: "Mikhail Loenko" Subject: Re: 2Stuart: [general] Removing "endorsed" packages from JAPI reports Cc: dev@harmony.apache.org In-Reply-To: <906dd82e0704260422k3556dd55i40a14a3080d6b4bb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <906dd82e0704252318m5cff5ef0kcfd43fdd2421c566@mail.gmail.com> <906dd82e0704260422k3556dd55i40a14a3080d6b4bb@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/26/07, Mikhail Loenko wrote: > well, let's resume discussion whether Harmony must contain implementation > of the endorsed specs of the same version as RI or may contain a newer version > > Tim, could you please comment on that? While that's an important discussion for the Harmony project to have, the japi pages I provide are intended to be independent of any one implementation project, so the decision you guys make is only tangentially relevant to what I do. However, if supporting a *newer* version is the issue, I could do what I do with newer JDK versions and configure my scripts to ignore differences caused by implementing a newer version of these packages - if these newer versions are available as jar files somewhere that I can download and japize. Stuart. -- http://sab39.netreach.com/