Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ivavladimir@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=iEB8+n48bB/Qk9xODcpgSk8/cVxjCuyhDUXRDRpiI9uLuvz4ykJPn4Np4hNEeu6MeA8ffEByL0ID25YSnEKc4/3bvIYsc7qWycy7ifEd3dGFCStPK4CVuFJMeHJ/efaFf4IdLnsOROtHUbbCeSZk7EQrJ9nqoyYVMb0g1lCpEUQ=
Message-ID: <7273946b0704170301x5a7fe899mbfce5ac7342049e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:01:48 +0700
From: "Vladimir Ivanov" <ivavladimir@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][luni] new test in tests.api.java.net.SocketTest failed
 on my Windows XP sp2
In-Reply-To: <462498F7.6050300@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <7273946b0704170150u10fe9f13vd430f0a3aa0399e2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46248CBA.7010702@gmail.com>
	 <7273946b0704170216k43e3165cx30a19eb0ce27ea92@mail.gmail.com>
	 <462498F7.6050300@gmail.com>

Yes, on my box this port occupied by CC/CI.
 Thanks, Vladimir

On 4/17/07, Ruth Cao <ruoshen.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> You are right, Vladimir.
>
> It is just because the 'port' variable is set to 8080 and on some
> machines this port has already been occupied.  The test case will pass
> if we use Support_PortManager.getNextPort() on my side.
>
> May some committer pls revert this? And I'll provide a new patch for
> this JIRA. Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
>
> Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> > I think it depends on environment. On my box this test failed on IBMVM
> > too.
> > Thanks, Vladimir
> >
> > On 4/17/07, Ruth Cao <ruoshen.c@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Vladimir,
> >>
> >> I provide this patch and it passes on my side (IBMVME/Windows & Linux).
> >> I'll try the test on DRLVM soon, thanks.
> >>
> >> Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> >> > New test added to the tests.api.java.net.SocketTest failed on my
> >> > Windows XP sp2 with execution log:
> >> >
> >> >    [junit] Running tests.api.java.net.SocketTest
> >> >    [junit] java.net.SocketTimeoutException: The operation timed out
> >> >    [junit]     at
> >> >
> >> org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:121)
> >>
> >> >
> >> >    [junit]     at
> >> java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:262)
> >> >    [junit]     at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:147)
> >> >    [junit]     at
> >> > tests.api.java.net.SocketTest$ServerThread.run(SocketTest.java:118)
> >> >    [junit]     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:661)
> >> >    [junit] Tests run: 57, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
> >> 41.11 sec
> >> >    [junit] Test tests.api.java.net.SocketTest FAILED
> >> >
> >> > Test was added by commit:
> >> > Author: ndbeyer
> >> > Date: Mon Apr 16 19:30:11 2007
> >> > New Revision: 529472
> >> >
> >> > Should we fix this test or revert this commit?
> >> >
> >> > thanks, Vladimir
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Ruth Cao
> >> China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Ruth Cao
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
>
>