Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ilya.neverov@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.132.245 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=tRxpte4OUmYCAG4vX3cS5R1nfpSM/bc007bYyvbXQkdR/cI80rdULqHmiepUwB7dbeV1hJb9TWmajkFi4dAhfZxY1od9DHb1jVFwNlmsSVwiS3COXu3nY7YU8sRPVTZ8XRVt/nNQoYUQDbqJx3tvjiWnLxDxZnTfrzIIE0U1fXs=
Message-ID: <4ed33be10704230346h2e873162x8127fbffb3815924@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:46:23 +0700
From: "Ilya Neverov" <ilya.neverov@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [build-and-test] Update: plan for improving of the new testing
 infra before switching to it.
In-Reply-To: <6e47b64f0704230325x33d54a90p3e7a52cfe1dc2341@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <6e47b64f0704230325x33d54a90p3e7a52cfe1dc2341@mail.gmail.com>

> To make further progress I think it makes sense to commit the
> implementation from [2] to SVN as it is. And continue development and
> bug fixing in SVN.

[+1]   I believe it will make development of that infra more productive.

I support approach with the '2.0' sub-directory of 'trunk'; no need
for branch is seen here.

Regards,
-Ilya

On 4/23/07, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to give an update about current status of buildtest infra.
> Currently we have the proposal [1] for the infra improvement, its
> implementation [2] and several testing suites that use the proposed
> approach. I think that the proposed infra is not quite ready to do the
> switch - I've reviewed the implementation and tried 4 suites with it;
> I've found several issues and I see some places where it can be
> improved. And I believe that the issues should be resolved before
> switching to the new testing infra.
>
> To make further progress I think it makes sense to commit the
> implementation from [2] to SVN as it is. And continue development and
> bug fixing in SVN. This will make improvement process more
> transparent, for example, currently there is tenth version of
> 'btinfra.zip' file and it is not possible to figure out what have
> changed since its first version.
>
> I'm not sure that a new branch should be created to check in the new
> infra. I think it may be acceptable to create sub-directory in trunk,
> say 'v2.0'. And continue the infra development and new suites
> integration there. After we find that the new infra in a good shape we
> can do the switch.
>
> Opinions?
>
> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200703.mbox/%3ce09a11790703262343m576dee90j5a59d52e14290274@mail.gmail.com%3e
> [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3501
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>


-- 
Thank you.
Ilya Neverov