Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20418 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2007 03:02:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2007 03:02:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 591 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2007 03:02:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 548 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2007 03:02:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 539 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2007 03:02:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:02:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of nbeyer@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.231 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.231] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:02:33 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id j2so14148nzf for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:02:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=q6IZLOJRUSjPBshHL6wqOQFhuVLkRNJ4B8cwFMs44WF8A7WPEiVpd5lCVvIPlpCcsD5FJ/Om7GKGpRXCMfG22EE08vQl04w8jqM95k+RSka/CvhzJWcST70tj/7+z5gO4te7G6J4HwBTY8q+RwNuFCerHxU6KCTtgifTOZj8QvE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=mUqKyHOr/SVFVtuyNz6/nApDLvAWPixupRdSNANR0bz6Y/cX6SbNx+nLvredL1t2LoXAd9SsfKf0UyzzyaG8U7ZZ7+XxtGP5M8xNbsplS6O3a2dhxPk6CmCD/9Bcz3bBT5MEBVDGStFA46hSN5gGhxY/KQaKM4psc5gW0AB+h8k= Received: by 10.114.126.1 with SMTP id y1mr3768wac.1176865332527; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.195.5 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3b3f27c60704172002n55170d89o7aa81b8c584c4099@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:02:12 -0500 From: "Nathan Beyer" Sender: nbeyer@gmail.com To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: Result Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development In-Reply-To: <6e47b64f0704171938t6e8ec809k34ea08881a6d207d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e47b64f0704161957y27b9f27cv531992da8a955fec@mail.gmail.com> <6e47b64f0704170323k44f3289aw92ae05062d01027@mail.gmail.com> <3b3f27c60704171438m4244412eqce356acf8a4704b7@mail.gmail.com> <6e47b64f0704171909sb1d11a8t953bb6e32cf71eb@mail.gmail.com> <3b3f27c60704171923j2c1d3268n2b8d6157ade11afe@mail.gmail.com> <6e47b64f0704171938t6e8ec809k34ea08881a6d207d@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 68d1edd7152f5ce3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Cool, thanks. On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote: > > If there aren't any objections, I'd like to rename it soon, while > > everything is still fresh. > > > > Agree. We can do it in the next way: we wait during 24 hours and if > there are no objections I'll rename it. > > -Stepan. > > > -Nathan > > > > On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote: > > > > I don't mean to be picky, but why the name "java6-branch" [1]? The > > > > parent folder is already "branches"; can we just rename it to "java6"? > > > > > > > > > > I don't have strong preference for that. I saw branch's names in > > > repositories with "branch" suffix and without. So no objections for > > > renaming from me. > > > > > > -Stepan. > > > > > > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/classlib/branches/java6-branch/ > > > > > > > > -Nathan > > > > > > > > On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > > > Done at r529549. > > > > > > > > > > I've create the branch and added 'java6' property to federated build. > > > > > So to build Harmony using federated build with Java 6 classlibrary it > > > > > should be set (for example, ant -Djava6=true) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Stepan. > > > > > > > > > > On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > > > > +1 from Stepan,Tony, Jimmy, Ruth, Paulex, Alexey Varlamov, Mikhail > > > > > > Fursov, Egor, Oliver, Mikhail Loenko, Sian, Xiaofeng, Leo, Robert, > > > > > > Alexey Petrenko, Kelvin, Sean, Gregory, Vikram, Spark. > > > > > > > > > > > > no other votes so this passes. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm going to create a branch for class library and update federated build today. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Stepan. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > > > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads: > > > > > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony > > > > > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final > > > > > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6 > > > > > > > [ ] 0 No opinion > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Stepan Mishura > > > > > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division >