Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wuyuehao@gmail.com designates
 209.85.134.190 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=f0JywhOlKVAEhkrhp/U2ohaExmqOa1rqMZqYVuIb5+bC6BGCf5QF6itNxv2xNFhH8tYrF/UgV9OYNOPt9FNvp3L11fnzDaLzDM6rzORCZQrGAY/1/hZP24L1aLn0n25Mr7em5W4l0OYxbhu8t6UVgqTr4IjqJn7l9TNF3hWtqmY=
Message-ID: <211709bc0704190023l6060b6ban3cf695a151223b00@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:23:39 +0800
From: "Tony Wu" <wuyuehao@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: Result Re: [vote] Create SVN branch for Java 6 development
In-Reply-To: <6e47b64f0704182202v55e13b78sb6d2142ab46057b5@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <6e47b64f0704161957y27b9f27cv531992da8a955fec@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0704170323k44f3289aw92ae05062d01027@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3b3f27c60704171438m4244412eqce356acf8a4704b7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0704171909sb1d11a8t953bb6e32cf71eb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3b3f27c60704171923j2c1d3268n2b8d6157ade11afe@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0704171938t6e8ec809k34ea08881a6d207d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0704182202v55e13b78sb6d2142ab46057b5@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Stepan,

I noticed that you copied the java6 from java6-branch, so we should
start at r529549 rather than r530247 when we need merge the updates
from trunk to java6. Am I right?

On 4/19/07, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote:
> > > If there aren't any objections, I'd like to rename it soon, while
> > > everything is still fresh.
> > >
> >
> > Agree. We can do it in the next way: we wait during 24 hours and if
> > there are no objections I'll rename it.
> >
>
> Done at r530247.
>
> -Stepan.
>
> > > -Nathan
> > >
> > > On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote:
> > > > > I don't mean to be picky, but why the name "java6-branch" [1]? The
> > > > > parent folder is already "branches"; can we just rename it to "java6"?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't have strong preference for that. I saw branch's names in
> > > > repositories with "branch" suffix and without. So no objections for
> > > > renaming from me.
> > > >
> > > > -Stepan.
> > > >
> > > > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/classlib/branches/java6-branch/
> > > > >
> > > > > -Nathan
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > > > Done at r529549.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've create the branch and added 'java6' property to federated build.
> > > > > > So to build Harmony using federated build with Java 6 classlibrary it
> > > > > > should be set (for example, ant -Djava6=true)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Stepan.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > +1 from Stepan,Tony, Jimmy, Ruth, Paulex, Alexey Varlamov, Mikhail
> > > > > > > Fursov, Egor, Oliver, Mikhail Loenko, Sian, Xiaofeng, Leo, Robert,
> > > > > > > Alexey Petrenko, Kelvin, Sean, Gregory, Vikram, Spark.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > no other votes so this passes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm going to create a branch for class library and update federated build today.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Stepan.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > > > > > The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> > > > > > > > - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> > > > > > > > - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
> > > > > > > > decision. So I'd like to start voting.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
> > > > > > > > [ ] 0  No opinion
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This vote will close 72 hours from now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Stepan Mishura
> > > > > > > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >
>
>
> --
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>


-- 
Tony Wu
China Software Development Lab, IBM