From dev-return-25639-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Wed Apr 04 06:56:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41038 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2007 06:56:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2007 06:56:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 47852 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2007 06:56:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 47539 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2007 06:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 47530 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2007 06:56:42 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:56:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.168] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:56:35 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z36so509725uge for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:56:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fdYkuP2tdgHkxeAhumFgb+cXK70kB0weUXlVBFE1650NDo0Am2w8zMb1GI7pWgvqHLgdivNUBi/BZlD2YoQKWgbwv12eRSypHQ44o1Q3qJME2cFpPQTipXF12cas674gGuaWrBwDjk1mD4etyyCTLVHN9D6Rteer2w1CPKyQ8og= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OI/WlNZxHlE8mNLsbZ3zNEbOs7FivzUeDlvEZ/sPwhvUfzlrV/3fnY732VFxmH5HT6bK5aORPb2ySRKgfgx+1ZnclmfaSwqb+ay+pKjrrwQ7cVLmL6qhfRVoGJNloD/zyBSrwXvKzMov3yFyrKHJ6LBF74HX5QKApoupo2FcOI8= Received: by 10.114.133.1 with SMTP id g1mr147771wad.1175669772572; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.120.5 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:56:12 +0400 From: "Alexey Petrenko" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] What platforms do we support? In-Reply-To: <46113F14.3080308@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3b3f27c60703302034r65b0cb21q9ceb0afca71be7a0@mail.gmail.com> <51d555c70703311222x54eb83a7q4c2cc361400c7313@mail.gmail.com> <3b3f27c60703311438r79483fccreded69b6939d1752@mail.gmail.com> <906dd82e0704012011t47d58abt6046a586940b3aed@mail.gmail.com> <3b3f27c60704012151i22422fbcy4631df24d1756b7a@mail.gmail.com> <46113F14.3080308@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As I said few times today and before... :) Yes, it looks like we can make uxtheme.dll an optional dependency for AWT module. I hope that will be enough to support W2K. And yes, I agree that we need to add this modification to our pre JavaOne issue list. I also believe that we definitely need Linux support. SY, Alexey 2007/4/2, Tim Ellison : > Nathan Beyer wrote: > > However, from looking back on this mailing list thread, I couldn't > > find any decision at the end of this or much of a consensus. I would > > like to pull this together, vote on it. document it (site, Wiki, etc), > > test it, etc. > > Agreed, let's try and get a consensus on what we will have in our M1 > build, and a date to shoot for it. > > I think we have a reasonable idea forming that it will be (taken from > your list): > > - IA32/x86 with a minimum of P3 (SSE, not SSE2) > - IA64/IPF (Intel 64-bit architecture) > - x86_64/AMD64/EMT64 (AMD architecture) > > - (Windows 2000 SP4?), Windows XP SP2, Windows 2003, > Windows 2003 R2, (Windows Vista?) > - Linux; kernel v2.4.x, v2.6.x > - (FreeBSD v???) > > I've put some in parentheses since we need to hear from people what work > is required to get them ready and stable. I also removed the priority > order since I think they are all equally important if we declare them > stable. > > An M1 date of April 30th would give us a stable build ready for > ApacheCon EU and JavaOne, which seems like a good goal. Working > backwards we would then focus on stability for whatever we have got from > April 23. > > I wonder if the Win2000 goal is possible in that timeframe? If not I > suggest we live with WinXP as a minimum requirement for M1. Do we know > what it takes to run on Vista/FreeBSD? Again I'm guessing non-trivial > work remaining and we should drop it from M1 if so. > > Regards, > Tim >