harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yang Paulex" <paulex.y...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:38:07 GMT
2007/4/11, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
>
> On 4/10/07, Yang Paulex wrote:
> > 2007/4/10, Alexey Petrenko :
> > >
> > > Yeah, let's start a branch.
> >
> >
> > So let's heads up a little into a little details :), currently
> in  Harmony
> > svn enhanced directory[1], we have classlib/drlvm/jdktools/others in
> > separated directories, and every directories has a subdirectory trunk,
> the
> > problem now is, do we branch whole enhanced directory[1], or create a
> branch
> > for every modules? I prefer the latter one a little, because: 1. not
> every
> > module needs(or wants) branch; 2. it's convenient for guys only working
> on
> > one area to maintain, for example, it's easier to a classlib contributor
> to
> > follow all classlib changes. I guess that's why the current directory
> > structure looks like.
> >
> > If so, another issue is how to deal with the federate build
> directory[2],
> > which aims at combining all modules as a whole HDK, depending on its
> > build.xml to "svn switch" subdirectory to relevant modules. Now I
> suggest we
> > either create a enhanced/branch/java6 for federate build, or update the
> > build.xml so that some options can be used to specify which branch the
> > federate build will use.
> >
> > Ideas?
> >
>
> As far as I understood you proposal the first step may be to create
> java6 branch for class library, update build.xml in federated build
> and see how thing will work. This will make possible for people
> contribute to 6.0 API development and learn how to work with SVN
> branches. Correct?


Yes, exactly.


Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
> > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/
> > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/trunk
> >
> > 2007/4/8, Andrew Zhang <zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com>:
> > > > On 4/8/07, Mikhail Fursov <mike.fursov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Bloggers blog while developers work :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I like we pushed RI to become open source. I like our scores in
> > > benchmarks
> > > > > and I like our plans on stability improvements for the next
> quarter.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ya,  but we need to do something more to prove that  Harmony is not
> only
> > > > toy.
> > > >
> > > > One thing I agree with the blog is about "branch". We need to think
> more
> > > > about branch.
> > > >
> > > > It's easy to use branch, but porting back fix and merge sound like
> > > nightmare
> > > > to me.
> > > >
> > > > What I really miss is an absence of Geir in our mailing list last
> > > weeks...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 07 Apr 2007 23:05:48 +0400, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $subj:
> > > > > >
> http://jroller.com/page/dgilbert?entry=the_death_of_apache_harmony
> > > > > >
> > > > > > entitled:
> > > > > > The Death of Apache Harmony
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just to let you know, and no comments.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Egor Pasko
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mikhail Fursov
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Andrew Zhang
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paulex Yang
> > China Software Development laboratory
> > IBM
> >
>
>
> --
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>



-- 
Paulex Yang
China Software Development laboratory
IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message