harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [snapshot] Freezing the code for Milestone build?
Date Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:28:41 GMT
Great. So CCs for x86 are up and all the critical issues are resolved.
It looks like time for freeze and prepare a build.

Did I forget something? Any other critical issues?

SY, Alexey

2007/4/27, Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@apache.org>:
> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > DRLVM has been switched back to GCv4.
> > HARMONY-3764 "[drlvm][build] jar with kernel classes' sources is not
> > generated" has been resolved
> > Patch for HARMONY-3730 "[drlvm][jvmti] SINGLE_STEP events are not
> > reported in JIT mode" has been applied but the issue is not closed.
> > Gregory, do you have anything to do with this issue or you just forgot
> > to press resolve button? :)
>
> Sorry, just forgot to mark it resolved indeed. Done now.
>
> > 2007/4/26, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> >> Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
> >> > On 4/26/07, Sergey Kuksenko <sergey.kuksenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Hi All,
> >> >>
> >> >> I wish to notify that GCv5 currently has a stability problem.
> >> >>
> >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3746
> >> >> I think We should fix the bug before freese or switch back to GCv4.1.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I noticed that, and am trying to reproduce it, so far can't reproduce
> >> > it locally. I am now trying to connect the test machine to check the
> >> > problem. Hopefully it can be fixed quite soon within two days.
> >> > Otherwise, I'd vote to switch it back to GCv4.1.
> >> >
> >> > The other solution would be to choose a revision and make a release
> >> > branch from it. Then we don't need to freeze the code base for new
> >> > developments. This is actually common for industry product release.
> >>
> >> Ok, let's wait and see what you conclude.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Tim
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Gregory
>
>

Mime
View raw message