harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2Stuart: [general] Removing "endorsed" packages from JAPI reports
Date Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:52:46 GMT
And we can do this ourselves...

2007/4/26, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> What we need I think is completeness metrics. Since those differences
> that are caused by newer specs are OK, they don't affect completeness.
>
> So the real API completeness might be higher than what we see now.
> Having the real picture would help us to first stick those really unimplemented
> classes remained and second better position our state
>
> So it's good to have both: compatibility that Stuart is currently measuring
> and completeness to what we want to achive.
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> 2007/4/26, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> > Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > > well, let's resume discussion whether Harmony must contain implementation
> > > of the endorsed specs of the same version as RI or may contain a newer
> > > version
> > >
> > > Tim, could you please comment on that?
> >
> > Only to say that the SE spec allows for us to implement a later version
> > of these endorsed external specifications; however, Stuart is measuring
> > compatibility to Sun's implementation, not compliance.  We should expect
> > to see a difference to the extent that the Corba code is incompatible
> > with previous versions.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message