harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] Removing "endorsed" packages from JAPI reports
Date Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:56:01 GMT
Yep, it is possible of course.
I've added this task to my nearest-future-to-do-list but have not
complete it yet. :)

I'll finish it this week.

SY, Alexey

2007/4/25, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> As it was discussed in the thread I'm copying, we are free
> to replace classes in the packages listed here [1] by "classes implementing
> a more recent version of the API as defined by the appropriate
> standards body" [2]
>
> Would it be possible to generate JAPI diffs not taking into account packages
> listed in [1] so that we get clear picture about amount of API work remained?
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/index.html
> [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html
>
>
>
> 2007/1/23, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> > Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > > 2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
> > >> so what do we do?  I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this
> > >> w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here...
> > > That would be great. Can you suggest something?
> >
> > As Alexey wrote, the level of CORBA support in the RI 5.0 [1] is
> > predominantly 2.3.1 based.  However, we are free to implement a later
> > version of the Corba spec and still be compliant since the CORBA code is
> > an "endorsed standard" (see [2]).
> >
> > In this case I suggest we support Yoko in their goal of implementing
> > corba 2.4 (and ignore the JAPI diffs).
> >
> > [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/idl/compliance.html
> > [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message