harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2Stuart: [general] Removing "endorsed" packages from JAPI reports
Date Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:12:00 GMT
2007/4/26, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>:
> And we can do this ourselves...

thanks for volunteering!

Thanks,
Mikhail

>
> 2007/4/26, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> > What we need I think is completeness metrics. Since those differences
> > that are caused by newer specs are OK, they don't affect completeness.
> >
> > So the real API completeness might be higher than what we see now.
> > Having the real picture would help us to first stick those really unimplemented
> > classes remained and second better position our state
> >
> > So it's good to have both: compatibility that Stuart is currently measuring
> > and completeness to what we want to achive.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail
> >
> > 2007/4/26, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> > > Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > > > well, let's resume discussion whether Harmony must contain implementation
> > > > of the endorsed specs of the same version as RI or may contain a newer
> > > > version
> > > >
> > > > Tim, could you please comment on that?
> > >
> > > Only to say that the SE spec allows for us to implement a later version
> > > of these endorsed external specifications; however, Stuart is measuring
> > > compatibility to Sun's implementation, not compliance.  We should expect
> > > to see a difference to the extent that the Corba code is incompatible
> > > with previous versions.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message