harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] Reminder: stable build goal at end of month
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:11:01 GMT
Do you think we should switch before "end of month"?
It's certainly a risk, but what is the value in the switch?

Thanks,
Mikhail

2007/4/18, Xiao-Feng Li <xiaofeng.li@gmail.com>:
> GCv5 might be one "major" that we want to put as default GC in DRLVM.
> It still has some issues pending, but overall I think the stability is
> good enough for a switch next week.
>
> Since GC is designed with good modularity, we can simply choose which
> GC implementation to use in command line with
> '-XX:vm.dlls=the_gc_module.dll(so)". This is neat that helps the
> switch a lot: If GCv5 has some problem running a workload, we can
> specify -XX:vm.dlls=gc_cc.dll in command line.
>
> So far the known bugs in GCv5 are not with some workloads, but related
> with certain test cases for finalizer and VM threading. And I think
> they are going to be resolved before next week.
>
> Thanks,
> xiaofeng
>
> On 4/16/07, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just a reminder, as discussed in various threads, we shall aim to
> > produce a solid build for Windows and Linux x86 (at least) at the end of
> >  next week; so that we have something to demo at ApacheCon and JavaOne
> > that is a true reflection of our current capabilities.
> >
> > Of course, the Milestone will be simply a snapshot, carrying our usual
> > caveats.  The idea is that with conference talks taking place we may
> > expect a few people to download a build and try it around that time, so
> > being in the middle of a major restructuring would potentially do us an
> > injustice.
> >
> > Most commits still seem to be on-going bug fixing, so that's all
> > goodness.  If you are planning on anything 'major' please ensure there
> > is enough time to get it stable, or please wait until after the
> > milestone build.  Similarly, if there is anything that is currently
> > 'broken' that you think really needs fixing for that stability, please
> > shout here on the list.
> >
> > There are still two weeks to go, I think the paranoia about not causing
> > regressions will really kick-in next week :-)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
>
>
> --
> http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
>

Mime
View raw message