harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vladimir Ivanov" <ivavladi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [snapshot] Freezing the code for Milestone build?
Date Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:53:22 GMT
Actually, not yet. Eclipse 3.1.1 failed to start in my env on WinXP :(
Probably, Ivan found the root cause for this failure (thread:
[drlvm][eclipse] eclipse failed to start today in my env on WinXp
x86).

 thanks, Vladimir

On 4/27/07, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vladimir wrote about problem with launching Eclipse. Was it resolved?
>
> 2007/4/27, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>:
> > Great. So CCs for x86 are up and all the critical issues are resolved.
> > It looks like time for freeze and prepare a build.
> >
> > Did I forget something? Any other critical issues?
> >
> > SY, Alexey
> >
> > 2007/4/27, Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@apache.org>:
> > > Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > > > DRLVM has been switched back to GCv4.
> > > > HARMONY-3764 "[drlvm][build] jar with kernel classes' sources is not
> > > > generated" has been resolved
> > > > Patch for HARMONY-3730 "[drlvm][jvmti] SINGLE_STEP events are not
> > > > reported in JIT mode" has been applied but the issue is not closed.
> > > > Gregory, do you have anything to do with this issue or you just forgot
> > > > to press resolve button? :)
> > >
> > > Sorry, just forgot to mark it resolved indeed. Done now.
> > >
> > > > 2007/4/26, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> > > >> Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
> > > >> > On 4/26/07, Sergey Kuksenko <sergey.kuksenko@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >> >> Hi All,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I wish to notify that GCv5 currently has a stability problem.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3746
> > > >> >> I think We should fix the bug before freese or switch back
to GCv4.1.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I noticed that, and am trying to reproduce it, so far can't reproduce
> > > >> > it locally. I am now trying to connect the test machine to check
the
> > > >> > problem. Hopefully it can be fixed quite soon within two days.
> > > >> > Otherwise, I'd vote to switch it back to GCv4.1.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The other solution would be to choose a revision and make a release
> > > >> > branch from it. Then we don't need to freeze the code base for
new
> > > >> > developments. This is actually common for industry product release.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ok, let's wait and see what you conclude.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Tim
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gregory
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message