Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45342 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 14:36:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 14:36:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 38635 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2007 14:36:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 38609 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2007 14:36:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 38600 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2007 14:36:56 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:36:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 216.86.168.178 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of geir@pobox.com) Received: from [216.86.168.178] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (216.86.168.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:36:46 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (unknown [67.86.14.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E96051931 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:36:23 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <906dd82e0703060550t50e88c9etced442584c90ba7b@mail.gmail.com> References: <906dd82e0703050053j19350331w9376df0c3d3331ad@mail.gmail.com> <906dd82e0703050644l2ed8a90fv52f6f65b11733908@mail.gmail.com> <46E5BD62-DFFE-4714-8829-3E714EC950C9@pobox.com> <906dd82e0703060550t50e88c9etced442584c90ba7b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Subject: Re: [general] Harmony Q2 release requirements Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:36:21 -0500 To: dev@harmony.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Mikhail Loenko wrote: > 2007/3/6, Geir Magnusson Jr. : >> >> I think that each release should be well tested and documented. We >> should do the release train, with each release getting better and >> better - no regressions unless we all agree there's a darn good >> reason for it. > > What would be the interval between the releases in the "train"? > If it's 3 months then yes we can have such a train. If it's a week > then > we all will be busy with releases and won' have time for coding Monthly? I think we can play it by ear - move forward, and adjust as we learn things. Also, we need to work it out so things don't grind to a halt at release time. I'll start a second thread to discuss this approach. geir