Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 216.86.168.178 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of geir@pobox.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <843dd4f00703032048x7b10e037t49fabb8cf23e8ad8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <211709bc0702270142k6d513af1g1e51133ae753a0c6@mail.gmail.com>
 <2c9597b90702280218m54979a51x6c705ae18a1aeabb@mail.gmail.com>
 <211709bc0702281838v14e78798kd1d61910487207a7@mail.gmail.com>
 <2c9597b90703010150k17266c17l3cc2768730cadc3a@mail.gmail.com>
 <1BF65799-9356-4B41-82A4-6330177C421C@pobox.com>
 <843dd4f00703032048x7b10e037t49fabb8cf23e8ad8@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <D747DCA1-B15E-4F7C-9D16-3F5FC72CD25D@pobox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geir@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [classlib][test]how to set up a http proxy server for unit test.
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:30:26 -0500
To: dev@harmony.apache.org


On Mar 3, 2007, at 11:48 PM, Ruth Cao wrote:

> 2007/3/3, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
>>
>> Why not leave them in the exclude list?
>
>
> Since in some tests (i.e.  
> tests.api.java.net.HttpURLConnectionTest), we can
> get all the test cases out of the exclude list using Jetty except  
> the one
> which needs a proxy server. If we comment out the related one, more  
> test
> cases can be run continuously.

Got it.  Too bad there isn't a notation for excluding specific tests,  
rather than just test classes :

   org.apache.harmony.whatever.Foo#testWoogie

>
> Also, what do we need from Jetty?
>
>
> We need a ProxyHandler that can start an embeded proxy server.  
> Jetty 6 has a
> plan to implement it, but it seems that it won't be available in a  
> short
> time[1] :-)
>
> [1] http://www.nabble.com/Jetty6-proxy-handler-t2721411.html
>
> Greg and Jan are really great
>> people, and may be willing to help us out, especially when they find
>> out that the World's First Implementation of Open  Source Java needs
>> it :)
>>
>> geir
>>
>> On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:50 AM, Alexei Zakharov wrote:
>>
>> >> that's not a bad idea, we can find all TODOs in exclude lists  
>> rather
>> >> than src code.
>> >
>> > Yes, this is exactly what I mean.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > 2007/3/1, Tony Wu <wuyuehao@gmail.com>:
>> >> Thanks Alexei,
>> >>
>> >> that's not a bad idea, we can find all TODOs in exclude lists  
>> rather
>> >> than src code.
>> >> I'll try if no one object.
>> >>
>> >> On 2/28/07, Alexei Zakharov <alexei.zakharov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Tony,
>> >> >
>> >> > IIRC we have agreed that commenting out test code is not the  
>> best
>> >> > possible solution. Can we just split off proxy-related tests  
>> into a
>> >> > separate test class (<something>ProxyTest for example) and  
>> then put
>> >> > this new class to exclude list?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > 2007/2/27, Tony Wu <wuyuehao@gmail.com>:
>> >> > > Hello all,
>> >> > > I have been working on moving out the exclude tests in
>> >> java.net these
>> >> > > days. Some of them need a proxy server. IIRC we have adopted
>> >> jetty to
>> >> > > avoid external server dependencies before, but  
>> unfortunately, the
>> >> > > ProxyHandler of Jetty has not been implemented yet. So I
>> >> purpose to
>> >> > > comment out the proxy related testcases and move out the test
>> >> class
>> >> > > from exclude list. I'll add a TODO in the code and wait for  
>> the
>> >> > > upcoming new version of Jetty.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Another way is tha find out another tool to set up a proxy
>> >> server. In
>> >> > > my opinion, we'd better not import another dependency if
>> >> possible. And
>> >> > > if it is not an embedding server, we have to write some ugly
>> >> code in
>> >> > > order to run test automatically.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > suggestions?concerns?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Alexei Zakharov,
>> > Intel ESSD
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
>
> Ruth Cao
> China Software Development Lab, IBM