Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49869 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2007 06:16:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2007 06:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 47747 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2007 06:16:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 47719 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2007 06:16:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 47710 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2007 06:16:36 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:16:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ivavladimir@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.171] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:16:25 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z36so530415uge for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:16:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fWdEfkqR6jSiZ3vEs01s7wXZD3wdQgMAlnQYf06cq4aHB8La21VwgFjWuVpdSolvFG4svIBLg/hJyGNEiQHeVcOssT1JimWKB1mdbYgX3neHPfc62BebMfZX6yCYDFI2zWKMiCSLQRgpqznuX6fWhXteVkTL2scjnkv90a6wGaU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BYg38tyV+Klxpt4CyF+SareZFzfvG6uJtk5xMySwRZhuiYHjoXn6HTX8nsNZMlj8dRp6+SzRUQcA5Y56pgQEaFYsMCiqMXXHdBnGdixw8395C29NBSUUeVcRAGAFQMqfuPVJVy4p5pVZZKDMU/zKG39UIUUJhY+NGxVgSTeS9KM= Received: by 10.78.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr244062hue.1172816163925; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.145.6 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:16:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7273946b0703012216r47ddec63jd66b7cb752363af8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:16:00 +0600 From: "Vladimir Ivanov" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm][tesing]run modes for DRLVM tests In-Reply-To: <469bff730703012204v2dc29b6cpbc3307cc3881acfd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7273946b0703010534s26631bcfq66272481bc82167@mail.gmail.com> <0vqejo9rm4o.fsf@gmail.com> <7273946b0703011858o2711d429pee9d50d32bf60649@mail.gmail.com> <469bff730703012204v2dc29b6cpbc3307cc3881acfd@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/2/07, Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote: > We have to make sure the default mode is 100% stable. It's just strange that > we did not test it in pre-commit checks till now. BTW in the default mode > all methods first compiled by JET so testing default mode may be considered > as testing JET + recompilation mechanics. I vote for changing JET to default > in pre-commit tests. > > To ensure coverage of other modes (JET, server) we may add them to the CC > testing. We should keep balance between the coverage of different modes by > pre-commit tests and the time needed to run them. Yes, I'll update the CC to run tests in 4 modes (int+jet+jit+opt). Should we add the server mode to CC testing? If yes the exclude lists for this mode should be added. thanks, Vladimir > > Thanks, > Pavel > > > On 3/2/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote: > > > > 2007/3/2, Vladimir Ivanov : > > > On 01 Mar 2007 18:58:47 +0300, Egor Pasko wrote: > > > > On the 0x28C day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > I think that we also should run DRLVM tests in the default (without > > > > > any switches) mode. > > > > > > > > why? has there been any test that failed in default mode while passing > > > > in jet, opt, server modes? > > > > OTOH the jet mode did not detect regressions for a long, either. The > > question of default settings is usually a subtle matter, but indeed > > testing of default mode by default seems reasonable ;) > > > > > > > > Seems we should check the default behavior of VM. And yes, this mode > > > has some specific bugs, for example, Harmony-2692. > > > > > > Thanks, Vladimir > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue 3276 was created to track it. Note, this > > > > > issue also update default test run modes from "int, jet, opt" to > > "int, > > > > > def, opt". > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vladimir > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Egor Pasko > > > > > > > > > > > > > >