Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of weldonwjw@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.187 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=XGmArZXfkz28KSgCje9LiZdTAQVhAaM34a/iJpOYT6rSduKa4IQ/vDyBVtTvrx+zMA/QFIvgPOpsxg5h/3YE0gk8Wx4f5HDW5LgyXfbcnBKdA/Bya4vd7nKJitzZMKTOYNkDhOlAFJk2IKOj5g9LGDspKNntI6YeK0POSe/H2P4=
Message-ID: <4dd1f3f00703270903k38558472h3c210aa9cad718a4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:03:06 -0700
From: "Weldon Washburn" <weldonwjw@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][threading] harmony-3065 problems
In-Reply-To: <4dd1f3f00703270812g35384c8bo5b5c339a661a7e8a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_2952_4854654.1175011386834"
References: <4dd1f3f00703261512g56e98cd2haf7fc0b82482cf47@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b36bc2a10703270316s3685534bxfa6fa74c5d508e6d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4dd1f3f00703270812g35384c8bo5b5c339a661a7e8a@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_2952_4854654.1175011386834
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Peter,
I will rerun "build test".  I only ran it once so far.  Maybe the bug is
intermittant??  Below is the console output.  It should be the same info as
in the /reports directories.  For some strange reason, I am having problems
finding the correct index.html.  Maybe it moved?


On 3/27/07, Weldon Washburn <weldonwjw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I will track down the logs right now.  I have no problem continuing work
> on h3065 (I thought you might want an easy excuse to set it aside.)


 [junit] Tests run: 48, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 14.371 sec
 [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.771 sec
 [junit] Tests run: 91, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 44.916 sec
 [junit] TEST java.lang.ThreadTest FAILED
 [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.361 sec
 [junit] Tests run: 16, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.342 sec


report-kernel-test:
[junitreport] Transform time: 20961ms
[junitreport] Transform time: 23116ms
[junitreport] Transform time: 19377ms

check-kernel-test:
     [echo]   ***************************
     [echo]   *** Kernel tests status ***
     [echo]   ***************************

     [echo]       Client mode JIT (default) PASSED
     [echo]       jitrino.OPT FAILED
     [echo]       interpreter PASSED

     [echo] Please find detailed results under
C:\t_harmony\trunk\working_vm\bui
ld\win_ia32_msvc_debug\semis\kernel.tests/reports directory.

BUILD FAILED
C:\t_harmony\trunk\working_vm\build\make\build.xml:373: The following error
occu
rred while executing this line:
C:\t_harmony\trunk\working_vm\build\make\build_component.xml:72: The
following e
rror occurred while executing this line:
C:\t_harmony\trunk\working_vm\build\win_ia32_msvc_debug\semis\build\targets\kern
el.test.xml:52: There were test failures.

Total time: 104 minutes 32 seconds
C:\t_harmony\trunk\working_vm\build>


 On 3/27/07, Peter Novodvorsky <peter.novodvorsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It would be very disappointing to leave it, because me and Pavel
> > Afremov already gave too much time to this patch. However, in general,
> > I agree that we should put off performance patches and concentrate on
> > architecture and stability.
> >
> > Weldon, could you please send us the log with and error, because I run
> > tests with patch from H-3065 applied and see no problems.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peter.
> >
> > On 3/27/07, Weldon Washburn <weldonwjw@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, h3065 patch fails the jitrino.OPT tests on
> > windowsxp.  Since
> > > this is a performance patch and has failed three or four attempts to
> > commit,
> > > how about recoding this patch as "later"?  This will give us a chance
> > to
> > > focus on basic stability problems.  Once the system is stable, we can
> > go
> > > back and fix the performance issues.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Weldon Washburn
> > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Weldon Washburn
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>


-- 
Weldon Washburn
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

------=_Part_2952_4854654.1175011386834--