Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17490 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2007 21:37:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2007 21:37:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 87646 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2007 21:37:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 87611 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2007 21:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 87602 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2007 21:37:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87599 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2007 21:37:44 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:37:44 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of weldonwjw@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.190] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:37:33 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so1502244nfe for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:37:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=gqBEscxUT+hdC934R0fHZ7CRv5Um4Um5Jzo7mxpF2iOvyApM4xz0Xtkv94Y6EFIJciQLd2qcE2IPUQhf2pgG97G+lnF3BYF9Av1tGvcinVWU6V4FDGUtXk34FKI8cFdPMGn74vIDQpWwDAH4DYPrNEzdn59q6NlZDkti/zfsDwA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Xj8M9sFSPv4Qt4RHgbkL9bxLYGKdRCdLib3aLY+PTI3MI+yh61sZEo7E68SkR1MBlyEZbmKSFYPfQp8qz9YhTu4NDscwHNCv7Lkwil7+RUCWeWZujq+4SQwZYnUBKJ9+EpTmNSvtW/Tu3WXVXjcNH+WA7LKvBLCITv5oXwAuj2g= Received: by 10.78.18.3 with SMTP id 3mr435635hur.1173562631380; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:37:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.137.2 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:37:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4dd1f3f00703101337g29a7f2d3v6b1dcb563e8dfde0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:37:11 -0800 From: "Weldon Washburn" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [drlvm][threading] Does Harmony-2742 describe the same problem as Harmony-3289? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6579_29354607.1173562631349" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_6579_29354607.1173562631349 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline They both deal with Thread Manager memory leak. How about tagging 2742 as a "duplicate" of 3289? -- Weldon Washburn Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division ------=_Part_6579_29354607.1173562631349--